its 'bear' man, 'bear arms'.
"Suns out, guns out"
its 'bear' man, 'bear arms'.
No I'm not. I'm saying that introducing stricter gun laws will make it harder for the " wrong " people to be able to get access to guns. It will not stop the crazy deluded person intent on killing as many people as they can in one incident from carrying out their wish. It just won't. I'm all for reducing the amount of weapons though. I'm not American, I'm British and live here but it's just my view. Hasn't gone down well on here and I'm obviously in the minority. I will close by saying this. I do WISH gun control would work, I really do.So are you saying @Spotty that you think the UK should remove all its gun control laws?
Noisy, are you saying that if the US introduced tighter / stricter gun rules and laws, it would stop mass shootings. ?"On February 8, 1864, Sumner submitted a constitutional amendment stating: All persons are equal before the law, so that no person can hold another as a slave; and the Congress shall have power to make all laws necessary and proper to carry this declaration into effect everywhere in the United States."
Yeh, but cannot deny peoples dated rights to bare arms.......such a sh** argument
Outdates "rights" are there to be amended, hence the name amendment!
so you're ok with gun control in the UK but not the USA?No I'm not. I'm saying that introducing stricter gun laws will make it harder for the " wrong " people to be able to get access to guns. It will not stop the crazy deluded person intent on killing as many people as they can in one incident from carrying out their wish. It just won't. I'm all for reducing the amount of weapons though. I'm not American, I'm British and live here but it's just my view. Hasn't gone down well on here and I'm obviously in the minority. I will close by saying this. I do WISH gun control would work, I really do.
The Americans take the second Amendment very very seriously. I mean ultra seriously. Nothing will change that.What if the right to bugger dogs was part of the ammendment? Would you still cry about it being changed? Because itis equally as absurd as the right to bare arms is in 2022.
It might.Noisy, are you saying that if the US introduced tighter / stricter gun rules and laws, it would stop mass shootings. ?
After sandy hook, I fear you might be right.The Americans take the second Amendment very very seriously. I mean ultra seriously. Nothing will change that.
Are you honestly pretending it wouldn’t?Noisy, are you saying that if the US introduced tighter / stricter gun rules and laws, it would stop mass shootings. ?
Some don't make the news is an understatement. I think the definition is like 4 or 5 wounded. There are probably a dozen of those in some cities alone per year. The vast majority aren't national news. Those that are young, black males especially aren't making it.
But it’s been changed before, that’s why it’s so absurd to hear people not understanding how amendments can workThe Americans take the second Amendment very very seriously. I mean ultra seriously. Nothing will change that.
No, I was asked if I would loosen gun controls in the UK. I said no. I am saying introducing them anywhere won't stop mass killings. Subjective of course but it's my view as a Brit, that it's the person with a gun who divides to kill lots of people. They could choose a crossbow, a knife, axe etc etc, if they want to do it they will. People on London bridge were knifed to death recently. Shall we ban knives ? By the common held view on here then their logic is remove them from society and it won't happen. The problem is, we ALL know it won't.so you're ok with gun control in the UK but not the USA?
It doesn't even need to be changed, it just needs to be understood correctly.But it’s been changed before, that’s why it’s so absurd to hear people not understanding how amendments can work
No I'm not. I'm saying that introducing stricter gun laws will make it harder for the " wrong " people to be able to get access to guns. It will not stop the crazy deluded person intent on killing as many people as they can in one incident from carrying out their wish. It just won't. I'm all for reducing the amount of weapons though. I'm not American, I'm British and live here but it's just my view. Hasn't gone down well on here and I'm obviously in the minority. I will close by saying this. I do WISH gun control would work, I really do.
Would it stop them all? No. But even if we stopped just one more by doing SOMETHING, it’s still worth it. Do you not agree?Noisy, are you saying that if the US introduced tighter / stricter gun rules and laws, it would stop mass shootings. ?
But it’s been changed before, that’s why it’s so absurd to hear people not understanding how amendments can work
No pretending at all. I'm saying 100% that I'm right. Gun control will not stop mass shootings. Your turn. Are you saying they will, by removing en mass people's rights to carry arms it will end mass killing ? How confident are you ? 100% sure.Are you honestly pretending it wouldn’t?
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.