bcblue1878
Player Valuation: £50m
No they’re not, they’re dead! I’m sure they’d both much rather be with their four kids living and enjoying watching them grown up!Very sad to hear but I guess, the couple are in a better place now.
No they’re not, they’re dead! I’m sure they’d both much rather be with their four kids living and enjoying watching them grown up!Very sad to hear but I guess, the couple are in a better place now.
Incredible stuff.Oh Lol at this guy. I was wondering when one would show up
I dont think you need any gun personally, but I am a Brit, and we are different re guns.
I mean, I would hazard a guess that a massive majority of assault rifle owners are not likely to do much other than sport and hunting with them, so would pass any checks and balances needed to own them anyrate. I also know that gun ownership is ingrained into your (I assume) culture, but a small change to #2 is all thats needed to reduce or eliminate the sort of thing we
I'm English, but fail to see how gun control stops mass shootings. If it worked I'd be signed up to it but as I've said, Im a proponent of the guns don't kill, people do ( Goldy looking chain tastic I know )I dont think you need any gun personally, but I am a Brit, and we are different re guns.
I mean, I would hazard a guess that a massive majority of assault rifle owners are not likely to do much other than sport and hunting with them, so would pass any checks and balances needed to own them anyrate. I also know that gun ownership is ingrained into your (I assume) culture, but a small change to #2 is all thats needed to reduce or eliminate the sort of thing we saw recently.
It will stop some of themNot one person, not one, has answered my question. Would gun control stop the person who determined to kill a lot of people ? They will do it, regardless and nothing will stop them. Removing guns - not " doable " by the way, or even reducing their availability isn't going to work. How many times have you heard " nothing would have stopped him / her, they were determined. I just don't believe gun control is going to stop the crazed gunman. Answer, will gun control stop the crazed, unstable person ?
I thought I was being very clearIs there a "Missing the point spectacularly" thread? Several recent posts by our new subreddit-philosopher need to be put into it.
so you think there's 0% chance tighter gun laws would have made any difference at all.This is the crux of my argument which is nothing will deter the person determined to carry out a mass shooting. The shooting in Plymouth recently is a good case in point. " Bare " that in mind please ( you deserved that, sorry )
Also for some on here referencing the 2A (like @Spotty) It's important to understand where it came from.
Read up on Shays rebellion and the whiskey rebellion (or any number of slave rebellions) and the lack of a standing federal army.
The Bill of rights was written some 15 years after the republic was born and was, in a sense, an effort to rectify the early problems that came with nationhood.
The amendment is badly misinterpreted today and used as a weapon it's self.
Totally insane argument this one.so you think there's 0% chance tighter gun laws would have made any difference at all.
This kid would have found the ways and means and the Robb elementary shooting would definitely have happened anyway and been just as devastating?
What about age, do you think there should be restrictions on under 21's like there is for alcohol?
Yes " FFS ", that argument. Your going to deny millions upon millions of people's right to bare arms for an argument that isn't nor has ever, been proven to work. Wasn't there some evidence following a shooting in a cinema in New York that was interesting. A fella walked into a cinema and shot six people whilst they were watching a movie. On being interviewed he was asked why, when there were three cinemas in close proximity, he chose THAT cinema to walk into. He said the the one he chose had a strict no gun policy. It was he said " easier " to kill people without being shot at himself. Anecdotal evidence I know but interesting none the less.
Yes " FFS ", that argument. Your going to deny millions upon millions of people's right to bare arms for an argument that isn't nor has ever, been proven to work. Wasn't there some evidence following a shooting in a cinema in New York that was interesting. A fella walked into a cinema and shot six people whilst they were watching a movie. On being interviewed he was asked why, when there were three cinemas in close proximity, he chose THAT cinema to walk into. He said the the one he chose had a strict no gun policy. It was he said " easier " to kill people without being shot at himself. Anecdotal evidence I know but interesting none the less.
excellent article!![]()
How the NRA Rewrote the Second Amendment
The Founders never intended to create an unregulated individual right to a gun. Today, millions believe they did. Here’s how it happened.www.brennancenter.org
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.