If I backed Biden, he'd definitely lose. So it's a no from me lol.....Trump firming even further as 1/3 favourite with the bookies. If folk think Biden is a likely winner, there’s value in his current odds of over 2-1.
If I backed Biden, he'd definitely lose. So it's a no from me lol.....Trump firming even further as 1/3 favourite with the bookies. If folk think Biden is a likely winner, there’s value in his current odds of over 2-1.
yeap, was patheticAfter Bernie won the first 3 states the neo liberal corporate democrats assembled like the power ranger robot and got the media in full swing. Well they have made their bed just hope for the peoples sake they won’t have to lay in it.
Why should the weight of one individual’s vote depend upon the population density of where they live? I’ve been voting for almost 20 years, and have yet to cast a truly meaningful vote for president. Barring continued growth in Nashville that changes the demographics of this state to a swing state or the abolition of the Electoral College, I never will. In a so called democracy, that’s bullshit.How can you really be ok with very few densely populated areas governing an entire country? The Senate is a shitshow, but it at least serves to protect that from happening.
They’re right.
The Framers wanted a presidential candidate to win a series of regional elections so they would represent the diverse interests of different parts of the country.
In 2017, Yahoo Finance did an analysis of each state based on their largest industries. Maine’s primary industries are hospitals as well as nursing and residential care facilities. Nevada’s primary industry is accommodation (tourism). California’s largest industries are computers and electronics manufacturing. It is plainly obvious that, even from a purely economic perspective, these states have vastly different interests.
Under the National Popular Vote compact, the voices of states with smaller populations (like Maine and Nevada) would be quickly drowned out by states with larger populations (like California and New York).
This would create what Alexis de Tocqueville warned against when he spoke of the potential for democracy to lead to a “tyranny of the majority.” It was for this reason that the Founding Fathers did not establish a pure democracy.
The National Popular Vote compact is unfair and is, in fact, antithetical to representative democracy. For a small state like Maine or Nevada to pass this compact is self-destructive—and it also potentially thwarts the votes of residents of larger states as well.
The big donors certainly will by lobbying for policies that would favor them or their businesses. Small donors like myself won't be making anything back.The donors will make it all back and then some. Trump or Biden will see to that.
Jones was certainly SUPPOSED to be on it. Another opportunity for Rogan to give that dangerous grifter a platformNah, he did his own show apparantly. Rogan has previously said he thinks Kulinksi is the most reasonable political pundit he’s interviewed... think this was his third or fourth time on the podcast.
Aye, the Democrats really do need to start thinking a little more outside the box and making new stars. Only problem is it might be too late by the next election, when America is a full blown autocracy
Hans van Spakovsky is not only a voter fraud crank, he's a bad historian.
Quality opposition lacking AOTS, regardless of the tactics employed, if the opposition could not find a path to victory we end up with what we have had to face, sadlySame with the tories, you wonder how anyone can keep voting for such scumbags but people still do

The big donors certainly will by lobbying for policies that would favor them or their businesses. Small donors like myself won't be making anything back.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.