Steven Pienaar

Status
Not open for further replies.
Kanchelskis apart, all 3 of them are not exactly terrifying names. We used to finish 5th/6th/7th with them... = meh.
It's what the clubs been for decades, and in that time they've been our best players.


Baines and piennar partnership on their day though would've got in any team in the league. They were brilliant
 
It's what the clubs been for decades, and in that time they've been our best players.


Baines and piennar partnership on their day though would've got in any team in the league. They were brilliant


It was a good partnership, but I think you are over-rating them and us.

Im a little more ambitious than celebrating 5th/6th/7th, and raving about decent players.

As good as Baines is to us and some Blues, he has been utterly average for England at best, and THATS what the rest of the world see.
 
My love for Pienaar died when he swerved us for the money darn saarf.
Don't give me the 'champions league' speech neither, he knew he wouldn't get in over Bale, modric, VDV and such, took the bright lights of London and a pay rise.

Going got tough and he bailed, we took him back because we were desperate.

This 1,000,000% (Apart from the 'desperate' bit - more to do with moylez not having a clue about a replacement RE: Pistone, Stubbs, Jeffers etc - all brought back by him)

Ungateful wee shoite, moylez rescued him from dortmund, and then he wanted parity with Arteta as top earner, wasn't getting it (Because he wasn't worth it) so sodded off to spurs (After he thought Chelsea wanted him as well lol ).

Couldn't get a game for them, then gave it the spiel (For those what fell for it) about being desperate to 'come home'. Played his best in that loan period, got his contract, and you know the rest...

The Baines /Pienaar partnership was 80% Baines; proof of the pudding can be found in Baines' goal return, which was at it's highest during the time pienaar was at spurs.

I'd say he shafted us, but moylez let him do so. They're welcome to each other AFAIC. :bye:
 
It was a good partnership, but I think you are over-rating them and us.

Im a little more ambitious than celebrating 5th/6th/7th, and raving about decent players.

As good as Baines is to us and some Blues, he has been utterly average for England at best, and THATS what the rest of the world see.
Think you need to step back to reality, we've been a mid table side for a good decade or so and relegation fodder for the decade before that.


And I'm not overrating the partnership at all, they were widely regarded as the best left side for a while and pretty much 90% of our play went through them, they carried us at times
 
This 1,000,000% (Apart from the 'desperate' bit - more to do with moylez not having a clue about a replacement RE: Pistone, Stubbs, Jeffers etc - all brought back by him)

Ungateful wee shoite, moylez rescued him from dortmund, and then he wanted parity with Arteta as top earner, wasn't getting it (Because he wasn't worth it) so sodded off to spurs (After he thought Chelsea wanted him as well lol ).

Couldn't get a game for them, then gave it the spiel (For those what fell for it) about being desperate to 'come home'. Played his best in that loan period, got his contract, and you know the rest...

The Baines /Pienaar partnership was 80% Baines; proof of the pudding can be found in Baines' goal return, which was at it's highest during the time pienaar was at spurs.

I'd say he shafted us, but moylez let him do so. They're welcome to each other AFAIC. :bye:
lol


Bitter much.

He was a far more important player to us than arteta was and quite rightly deserved parity.

And baines being most of the partnership, yeah all right then. Just look at Baines both attaching wise and defensively when he doesn't have piennar with him, he's an absolute shadow of the player
 
Think you need to step back to reality, we've been a mid table side for a good decade or so and relegation fodder for the decade before that.


And I'm not overrating the partnership at all, they were widely regarded as the best left side for a while and pretty much 90% of our play went through them, they carried us at times

whoopee doo, they carried us to the greatness of 7th, get them in the hall of fame.

Im aware where we are and have been, and its not good enough, so I wont be lauding these players.
 
whoopee doo, they carried us to the greatness of 7th, get them in the hall of fame.

Im aware where we are and have been, and its not good enough, so I wont be lauding these players.
So people aren't allowed to say any player over the past 30 years was any good?


No ones comparing them to the greats of the 80s and before. But compared to what we've seen over the past 3 decades they're the best of the bunch
 
Bitter much.

Not really - I warned people what would come of it at the time, and I was proven right. Seems some just see what they want to. Hats off to him for working his ticket, like. But imo he had us over.

He was a far more important player to us than arteta was and quite rightly deserved parity.

No, he just wasn't, and never did. I seen more half arsed performances from him than I did Arteta - who brought (And always would have) a lot bigger fee than pienaar would've ever done.

And baines being most of the partnership, yeah all right then. Just look at Baines both attaching wise and defensively when he doesn't have piennar with him, he's an absolute shadow of the player

Really? They were known as the best LHS partnership for the attacking prowess. Baines scored something like 7 goals in the few months pienaar was away. (Dunno how many he set up). Pienaar couldn't hit a shot with any venom. I've seen 14 year old kids with a harder shot than him. All's he was good at was them 90 degree balls - and that's when they came off.

Well, that, and throwing his arms up to the sky when he went to ground every bleedin' time, instead of getting up & trying to retrieve the ball.

No mate. Pienaar wasn't all that.
 
So people aren't allowed to say any player over the past 30 years was any good?

This baffles me as well

The problem over the last couple of decades isn't that we didn't have good players, but more that we didn't have ENOUGH of them

If we'd had a 23 man squad of players at Pienaars level When he was at his peak, we'd've won things

It's not his fault we didn't have enough money to have decent squad depth
 
Not really - I warned people what would come of it at the time, and I was proven right. Seems some just see what they want to. Hats off to him for working his ticket, like. But imo he had us over.



No, he just wasn't, and never did. I seen more half arsed performances from him than I did Arteta - who brought (And always would have) a lot bigger fee than pienaar would've ever done.



Really? They were known as the best LHS partnership for the attacking prowess. Baines scored something like 7 goals in the few months pienaar was away. (Dunno how many he set up). Pienaar couldn't hit a shot with any venom. I've seen 14 year old kids with a harder shot than him. All's he was good at was them 90 degree balls - and that's when they came off.

Well, that, and throwing his arms up to the sky when he went to ground every bleedin' time, instead of getting up & trying to retrieve the ball.

No mate. Pienaar wasn't all that.
Had us over? All he wanted was parity with our other two big earners which was perfectly acceptable, we took the piss and he rightly moved on. There's no such thing as loyalty when money's involved, chuck enough at Barkley and he'd be out the door first thing.

They were hands down the best Lhs at the time, didn't matter how he hit shots, he was vital to how we played and main job was creativity rather than goals.


How many of them Baines goals were free kicks and penalties?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top