Nice post, i get what you're saying.
However........
Do you think he is good enough to be our back up right back now ? Are you fine with him starting at Leicester ?
The original post I was referring to you and the question you are asking, or the answer you are attempting to manipulate from myself, are not one and the same.
It is the same as saying as saying: does have a dog have four legs? Therefore as a result, do dogs like cat food? Same relevance between the two.
Would Hibbert have made it as a footballer has no relevance to should he play on the opening day of the season.
Nevertheless, as I'm in a jolly good mood I will answer the question you've posed. Quite easily I can say 'No I am not'.
Defensively he has, and hopefully still is, sound. He can read the game relatively well, has had a strong tackle and has shown reliability.
However, as I've mentioned his offensive abilities are somewhat lacking. Singularly that is concerning, yet it it's overall effect which is of a concern.
If he is unable to gallop forward like a cavalry horse, sending the foe into retreat, then our right hand side will be significantly weakened.
Will this force Mirallas to adopt his game? How about the movement of other players (Barkley et al)? Will it overwork the left? All these are genuine concerns.
While I believe that he still has some ability to commit at the back (when the rustiness is off his iron legs), it is the adaptation of our overall game plan which cannot be jepardised in the long term.
Short term yes, but in the long term it must be something which we address.
Anyway regardless of what we think, unless there is a dramatic shift in the universe as we know it, he WILL start against Leicester so let's get use to it and support him and Martinez.
However.... In the spirit of your original post...
If Tony Hibbert was a type of dog: what type of dog would he be?