Current Affairs Sadiq Khan......London Mayor.....

[longers]

They are all facts.. Just because he’s a labour man doesn’t lessen the point he’s an odious little toad. Look them up.

Back up your claims with factual evidence and links pls. When and where did he fight with all his might to defend terrorists ?

 

[Yoda]

Back up your claims with factual evidence and links pls. When and where did he fight with all his might to defend terrorists ?

Cos I’m quite new not sure how to upload. But I thought it was common knowledge he was the lawyer defending terrorists and their is lots of footage show him passionately defending them

 

[longers]

Cos I’m quite new not sure how to upload. But I thought it was common knowledge he was the lawyer defending terrorists and their is lots of footage show him passionately defending them

So he was just doing his job as a human rights lawyer ?

 

[roydo]

Cos I’m quite new not sure how to upload. But I thought it was common knowledge he was the lawyer defending terrorists and their is lots of footage show him passionately defending them

I am new to this thread, but a lawyer defending a client does not mean they are in agreement with what the client is accused of.

For example, the godfather to one of my lads has defended many paedophiles in court. Not because he agreed with them, but because he would make his defence so robust, that any prosecution would be a safe one.

 

[Yoda]

So he was just doing his job as a human rights lawyer ?

Went out of his way to represent these guys which (can’t be proven) was paid for by the Muslim Brotherhood, but he put brick walls up for information regarding payments. Was also know for giving legal advice for three separate groups of know terrorist organisations. He later claimed he didn’t know these people had extreme links

 

[longers]

Went out of his way to represent these guys which (can’t be proven) was paid for by the Muslim Brotherhood, but he put brick walls up for information regarding payments. Was also know for giving legal advice for three separate groups of know terrorist organisations. He later claimed he didn’t know these people had extreme links

I've googled these things and can find little information on them ? Got any credible links from reputable news sources ? Not saying you're lying but there really doesn't seem to be much information on any of it... unless I just suck at google.

Even if all of that is 100% true he's still better than Zac Goldsmith

 

[Yoda]

I've googled these things and can find little information on them ? Got any credible links from reputable news sources ? Not saying you're lying but there really doesn't seem to be much information on any of it... unless I just suck at google.

Even if all of that is 100% true he's still better than Zac Goldsmith

Sadiq Khan links to terrorist groups. Pre MP years. Family members involved in terrorist groups should show them.

Zac Goldsmith, the only thing I liked about him was the fact he was very pro small business. Wanted loads of tax cuts to help. I’m biased because I’ve got a small business

 

[roydo]

Sadiq Khan links to terrorist groups. Pre MP years. Family members involved in terrorist groups should show them.

Zac Goldsmith, the only thing I liked about him was the fact he was very pro small business. Wanted loads of tax cuts to help. I’m biased because I’ve got a small business

Hell of an accusation that mate.

Back it up, or back out.

 

[Yoda]

Hell of an accusation that mate.

Back it up, or back out.

Hey! He said he couldn’t find links, I said these will show them.

 

[roydo]

Hey! He said he couldn’t find links, I said these will show them.

Well show them then You made the accusation.

 

[Yoda]

Hey! He said he couldn’t find links, I said these will show them.

Hell of an accusation that mate.

Back it up, or back out.

The accusations I’m pointing out are that he has certain sympathies for extreme Islamic groups

 

[roydo]

The accusations I’m pointing out are that he has certain sympathies for extreme Islamic groups

So back it up.

 

[Yoda]

So back it up.

Don’t know how too link

 

[Harryflashman]

I am new to this thread, but a lawyer defending a client does not mean they are in agreement with what the client is accused of.

For example, the godfather to one of my lads has defended many paedophiles in court. Not because he agreed with them, but because he would make his defence so robust, that any prosecution would be a safe one.

Spot on .

It’s absolutely essential to the existence of a society , just because people may be guilty of heinous crimes they require a strong advocate because firstly you never know if you’ll be wrongly accused of such a crime but secondly whether guilty or not you’re entitled to a defence because without it the system fails .

 

[roydo]

Spot on .

It’s absolutely essential to the existence of a society , just because people may be guilty of heinous crimes they require a strong advocate because firstly you never know if you’ll be wrongly accused of such a crime but secondly whether guilty or not you’re entitled to a defence because without it the system fails .

Quite. The legal world isnt all Judge Dread or Silks.

Often, the advocates of a defendant know all too well they are guilty. But in what may appear perverse, they take great delight in making their defence so good, if the CPS/whoever, gets a win, they are happy in the knowledge that a baddun is sent down, and wont be sprung on some spurious technicality a few years later.