Current Affairs Sadiq Khan......London Mayor.....

Status
Not open for further replies.
Khan could have stopped it but didn't, so we can assume that he is in favour. I find Tommy Robinson a despicable character but its a pity that you don't equate his freedom of speech with your own. The whole balloon thing is childish and the insult to a visiting head of state is immature but sadly, not surprising.
No, Khan didn’t stop it as he couldn’t find good reason as to why. It’s freedom of speech and expression.

Where have I spoken about Robinson’s right to free speech? He got jailed for breaching the terms of his suspended sentence, and pleaded guilty btw.

Insulting a bloke who thinks nothing of abusing anyone he sees fit via the medium of Twitter? A narcissistic hate peddling bigot who has mocked the disabled, grabbed women by the crotch, is the subject of numerous sexual assault accusations, is an obvious misogynist, put kids in cages at the Mexican border, uses words like ‘infestation’ about immigrants to dehumanise them and has created a weird ‘post truth’ culture where he derides anything that he doesn’t agree with as ‘fake news’. The man is vile and I have no issue with Brits making him aware that we’re not having him.
 
Not sure what all the fuss is about the London mayor position, apart from being the capital, the position of London Mayor is just figurehead compared to the proceeding Mayoral positions. Andy Burnham position is far influential to its electorate!

But baby Trump balloon is funny, sure to get the snowflakes and political correctness wombles triggered!
 

Attachments

  • 9C921D82-83FB-4A04-8B7B-2F674CEB2A04.webp
    9C921D82-83FB-4A04-8B7B-2F674CEB2A04.webp
    71.9 KB · Views: 5
Khan could have stopped it but didn't, so we can assume that he is in favour.

Really? Maybe he thought that banning this silly and ultimately futile little protest would cause greater uproar for no good reason.

So long as it's passed as safe for air traffic then it's nothing more than an expensive banner on a long piece of string. Flick through the majority of the newspapers in this country and the USA over the last couple of years and you'll see much more vicious cartoons of Trump that will have been seen by many more people.

Were people so furious about Spitting Image?
 
Really? Maybe he thought that banning this silly and ultimately futile little protest would cause greater uproar for no good reason.

So long as it's passed as safe for air traffic then it's nothing more than an expensive banner on a long piece of string. Flick through the majority of the newspapers in this country and the USA over the last couple of years and you'll see much more vicious cartoons of Trump that will have been seen by many more people.

Were people so furious about Spitting Image?
Maggie and Kinnock were, so it gets a pass from me...and you're right about the balloon
 
You’re conflating issues in order to create a false narrative.

Khan didn’t organise the balloon, so any equivalence with Erdogan has nothing to do with him. Albeit there were protests against Erdogan in London that we’re granted permission, just no balloon.....

In allowing this balloon to fly, he’s done so as he can see no reason why this doesn’t just simply constitute free speech. A principle which Trump and his followers are supposedly massive advocates of. Personally I think it’s a bit childish, but then so is Trump, so it’s probably rather apt. I find it hilarious that the far right “Free Tommy” and people like yourself are getting so upset by this.

I’m not getting upset about this. I think he should actually be doing his job....someone who actually has experience of doing a mayors job says the same....

“Mr Giuliani said: “Sadiq Khan should be ashamed of himself. He’s so busy attacking President Trump’s visit and, in the meantime, crime is spiralling in London. Maybe he should just do his job instead of attacking a world leader.”......
 
I’m not getting upset about this. I think he should actually be doing his job....someone who actually has experience of doing a mayors job says the same....

“Mr Giuliani said: “Sadiq Khan should be ashamed of himself. He’s so busy attacking President Trump’s visit and, in the meantime, crime is spiralling in London. Maybe he should just do his job instead of attacking a world leader.”......
Is that the same Giuliani who’s on Trumps payroll? That Guiliani?
 
No. Nor did he pick a fight with the leader of his country’s closest ally.........
It’s not Khans balloon.......and it’s ermmmm a balloon. One poxy balloon lol.

Loving the fact that Trump already patently hates the idea, the small hands will have him spewing, brilliant lol
 
It’s not Khans balloon.......and it’s ermmmm a balloon. One poxy balloon lol.

Loving the fact that Trump already patently hates the idea, the small hands will have him spewing, brilliant lol

It’s not the balloon which few people will actually see, certainly not Trump. It’s about his public spat with Trump, which should not be getting in the way of U.K./USA relations, and his double standards approach with visiting world leaders. He is a lightweight, sixth former type, Mayor.......
 
It’s not the balloon which few people will actually see, certainly not Trump. It’s about his public spat with Trump, which should not be getting in the way of U.K./USA relations, and his double standards approach with visiting world leaders. He is a lightweight, sixth former type, Mayor.......
It’ll be in news channels and social media all over the globe.

Trump described London as a ‘war zone’ due to knife crime, whilst speaking to his beloved sponsors the NRA and trying to use that lie to somehow justify his stance on US gun law. Khan didn’t rise to it. So what public spat are you referring to?

What double standards as well? Please explain exactly how he’s shown double standards in relation to other world leader visits?
 
It’s not Khans balloon.......and it’s ermmmm a balloon. One poxy balloon lol.

Loving the fact that Trump already patently hates the idea, the small hands will have him spewing, brilliant lol
What do you reckon Khan would say if it was one poxy balloon of Mohammed? I mean as you say it’s just eerrrmmm a balloon.
 
What do you reckon Khan would say if it was one poxy balloon of Mohammed? I mean as you say it’s just eerrrmmm a balloon.

How does an act that would be solely intended to incite Muslims have equivalence with a piece of political satire aimed at one man?

What’s Khans religion got to do with anything btw?
 
How does an act that would be solely intended to incite Muslims have equivalence with a piece of political satire aimed at one man?

What’s Khans religion got to do with anything btw?
But as you say it’s just a Poxy balloon(that’s the point) would he be okay having one of Erdogan as a big baby flying above then when he visits?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top