bluebottle
Player Valuation: £35m
Also i would say Vic's movement has improved as a result of Jelavic and warrants a start ahead of him when fit at the moment,we cant keep allowing Jelavic to play himself in to form.
Its very much his timing that is off really, his positional sense and ghosting in and around the box is fine. He does keep mistiming headers, struggling to control the ball in the box and not really hitting the ball sweetly at all. For a player who looks slightly ungainly naturally, to lose his rhythm makes it look ten times worse.That's your opinion mate and that's fine. I'm seeing the total opposite from that performance last night.
It depends if you're looking at his overall performance or just his finishing. If you're going on his finishing, obviously we may as well have Vellios on the pitch as Jelavic was poor. But I look at it this way - he was involved often enough last night for you to actually notice he was missing. If he was completely anonymous, I'd be far, far more concerned.
Also i would say Vic's movement has improved as a result of Jelavic and warrants a start ahead of him when fit at the moment,we cant keep allowing Jelavic to play himself in to form.
Its very much his timing that is off really, his positional sense and ghosting in and around the box is fine. He does keep mistiming headers, struggling to control the ball in the box and not really hitting the ball sweetly at all.
I guess had this and that happened, we'd be talking of his revival. Dont get me wrong, I dont think he had a bad game, but he is forcing the issue a bit and trying to will the ball in, rather than do it naturally. Like i said before, a player who is a bit ungainly by nature, to lose rhythm makes his performances look glaringly awful when comparitive to a player like a Mirrallas or a Ba if they are missing out.He could have had a goal and two assists last night if Gibson and Jagielka has converted and if Jelavic was a matter of six inches closer to the ball when Ossie flicked on that header.
If he had two assists and a goal, this discussion wouldn't be happening, and we'd be talking about Jelavic as an automatic starter.
I know "if" doesn't mean much, but that's how narrow the margins are in football. If we suddenly dropped Jelavic after an encouraging overall performance like that, he'll never get scoring again.
I agree with you that Vic should be playing but I think they're different players that can play in the same team.
Also i would say Vic's movement has improved as a result of Jelavic and warrants a start ahead of him when fit at the moment,we cant keep allowing Jelavic to play himself in to form.
Good post. In the old days they were known as poachers, and as you say they relied on an entire system being in place to get the best out of them.
I think Jelavic has more to his game than a traditional poacher though as he gets himself about and doesn't solely rest on the shoulder of the last man (although that's where his best work is), so as proven last year he can work well as a starter in the Premier League.
Issue with a poacher is that they're by definition confidence players. What is definitely true about Jelavic is that at the moment he's almost taking a sharp intake of breath before taking on a chance and invariably fluffing his lines, because he's so desperate to put them away. You can see it on his face - even when Ossies goal went in he was devastated he hadn't got on the end of it.
But it'll come. I can see the talent hasn't gone and he'll find the net soon enough, and we'll start laughing at people suggesting we get rid for £5m in the summer etc.
I guess had this and that happened, we'd be talking of his revival. Dont get me wrong, I dont think he had a bad game, but he is forcing the issue a bit and trying to will the ball in, rather than do it naturally. Like i said before, a player who is a bit ungainly by nature, to lose rhythm makes his performances look glaringly awful when comparitive to a player like a Mirrallas or a Ba if they are missing out.
I think Vic and Jelavic up top would be a better option if our manager ever played 4-4-2. Vic offering what Fellaini does near enough in terms of holding the ball up, with a bit more going the other way.
What is definitely true about Jelavic is that at the moment he's almost taking a sharp intake of breath before taking on a chance and invariably fluffing his lines, because he's so desperate to put them away. You can see it on his face - even when Ossies goal went in he was devastated he hadn't got on the end of it.
I disagree, I think he's actually got less to his game than a traditional poacher, or at least a good one. I've said before about his runs in behind, often they're decent runs and he bases a lot of his game on them, but how often have you seen him get into a one on one with the keeper? He's not quick, he can't outmuscle centre backs and you rarely see him get through in yards of space, which would indicate that his runs aren't brilliant anyway.
As much as he tries to get involved in the rest of the game, I don't think getting himself about cuts it to be honest. He doesn't offer much in general play. There have been similar types of players over the years that have a far superior all round game. The thing is most of them have cost a decent amount of money, whereas we have someone who cost 5 million as our main striker.
The dead horse has been flogged so much it doesn't even look like a horse anymore, it's just a load of squishy horse meat and broken bones.
I hope you're proud.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.