2025/26 Nathan Patterson

[NathDogg]

It was just a mildly sarcastic assessment of Patterson's wayward crossing today HC, it's not as if I'm on here calling fellow Evertonians bellends, gimps and whoppers is it?

“Fellow Evertonians”

 

[NathDogg]

View attachment 339775

You missed off the header Eggsy boy.

“Big shift from Patto on Saturday”

You feeling alright boss?

 

[SJB]

Patterson v Sunderland

3 Dribbles (1 successful)
7 Duels Won (6 lost)
6 Crosses (1 successful)
Passing Accuracy 76% (Second lowest on the team)
Possession lost a whopping 22 times.

 

[davek]

Patterson v Sunderland

3 Dribbles (1 successful)
7 Duels Won (6 lost)
6 Crosses (1 successful)
Passing Accuracy 76% (Second lowest on the team)
Possession lost a whopping 22 times.

Shhhhhhhh! Bologna might be reading this forum

 

[NathDogg]

Patterson v Sunderland

3 Dribbles (1 successful)
7 Duels Won (6 lost)
6 Crosses (1 successful)
Passing Accuracy 76% (Second lowest on the team)
Possession lost a whopping 22 times.

Sniff sniff matey boy.

 

[NathDogg]

Shhhhhhhh! Bologna might be reading this forum

Alright bigot in chief.

Hope you’re well mucker.

 

[davek]

Sniff sniff matey boy.

Yeah....err...we've got to hang onto 'Patto'. He's been a great signing.

Whoever signs him are lucky to get him. He'd probably suit...erm....Serie A...cough....he'd do a job for an Italian team....cough....

 

[Drico]

Yeah....err...we've got to hang onto 'Patto'. He's been a great signing.

Whoever signs him are lucky to get him. He'd probably suit...erm....Serie A...cough....he'd do a job for an Italian team....cough....

The Italian job.

 

[SJB]

Sniff sniff matey boy.

Again I will reiterate, after your spectacular New Year's Day meltdown on this thread, I will not engage with you in any conversation that might put you back in the darkest of dark places. It was upsetting seeing you implode in such a manner and I will not play any part in anything that might lead to a relapse for you.

If you wish to speak to me about Nathan Patterson, then make it constructive conversation only please.

 

[mahermi1]

Shhhhhhhh! Bologna might be reading this forum

C'mon Dave he's hardly played this year, but even you have to admit he played really well against Wolves.

 

[NathDogg]

C'mon Dave he's hardly played this year, but even you have to admit he played really well against Wolves.

Blinded by hate just like @SJB mate.

 

[Hinchcliffe's Corner]

Patterson v Sunderland

3 Dribbles (1 successful)
7 Duels Won (6 lost)
6 Crosses (1 successful)
Passing Accuracy 76% (Second lowest on the team)
Possession lost a whopping 22 times.

Can you run these numbers in every player thread so it doesn't look like you've got an agenda? Im sure you don't, you're a decent fella SJ.

 

[NathDogg]

Again I will reiterate, after your spectacular New Year's Day meltdown on this thread, I will not engage with you in any conversation that might put you back in the darkest of dark places. It was upsetting seeing you implode in such a manner and I will not play any part in anything that might lead to a relapse for you.

If you wish to speak to me about Nathan Patterson, then make it constructive conversation only please.

I just reiterated what the official EFC website posted my pinky chum, yet you had to go to your dark place and find negatives in it…..instead of trying to tell me what I should think and feel, I suggest you take a look in the mirror my “blue” brother.

 

[davek]

C'mon Dave he's hardly played this year, but even you have to admit he played really well against Wolves.

He didn't score on OG while he was on the pitch.

Anyway, he's going to be a Bologna players soon.

Best of luck to him and no hard feelings.

 

[SJB]

Can you run these numbers in every player thread so it doesn't look like you've got an agenda? Im sure you don't, you're a decent fella SJ.

That is an administrative task I have no inclination to take on HC.

I posted the stats here as a realistic overview of NP's stats from the game after the club posted a very short version on their social media, which was subsequently republished on this thread. Context. No agenda.