This isn't vaulting - I just searched "Moyes Strikers" and this is as close to tops as I could be assed reading.
Was Moyes a victim of his own success?
Moyes brought Marcus Bent in for £450k, Cahill came in at the same time and Everton finished fourth. What a bit of business, what a finish, what a masterstroke. Bent ran the channels, held the ball up, bought us time and engineered space for Cahill to exploit - and exploit he did (Was it 15 league goals from a midfielder?)
The system worked, Carsley swept up and plugged the gaps when we were caught in possession, it was one up front (Bent) and we harassed other sides with numbers in the middle and closed them down to death. It was a revelation.
Was that the formula? Is that what Moyes stuck to? It worked once, it could work again - surely? And from then on Strikers were brought in and slowly their roles changed, from striking more regular than a box of swan matches players went off the boil and stopped producing the goods, even Yakubu - big reputation, loads of goals, turned up for us for a season then was looking to link play and utilise others instead of just looking for the finish. Johnson was busted with the Bent role because he wasnt as big and strong but was quicker and penalised as a diver. Beattie wasnt quick enough. Saha had the lot but was another that found himself much like Jelavic recently drifting to the left flank looking for the ball or to work space for an overlap.
Cottee was a poacher, that forward that knew his job was as close to their 6 yard box as he could stay onside for.
Beckford scored a few but wasn't top flight and had to use the flanks to try to get possession. Ask yourself - is the one endearing memory of Strikers under Moyes that of a player more often looking to come deep or work wide for the ball instead of sniffing out space to get on a cross in the middle or pressurizing the keeper or looking for the shoulder of the last defender.
Its said Keepers are a different player apart from all others, lunatics and odd characters (by comparrison) and that might be because their role is so unique because in a team game their job is so isolated. I put it to the forum that a striker has to be similar in mindset, being the pinnacle, the apex of the side and converting the culmination of the rest of the sides efforts. Under Moyes it seemed and more so with retrospect that strikers were another cog in the means to an end - an end that simply never came because the finisher didnt exist.