Err didn't Arteta join in January on loan, as a replacement for Gravesen???
Check edited post above before you posted that

Err didn't Arteta join in January on loan, as a replacement for Gravesen???

Check edited post above before you posted that![]()
Arteta didn't join until January mate WTF?
what date did arteta join?
Again, check edited post above.
So what you're saying is you went back and re-wrote history?
*dangles hook in water
Sorry but that season in 2005, the league table did lie. We're the only team in the history of the Premier League to finish in the top 4 with a negative goal difference. Hence why we promptly finished 11th the season after, with pretty much the same squad
We were tipped to struggle by the idiotic media because Rooney left but we were a really solid squad on paper when set against a lot of the dross around us.
And I really like the thought of us having the two most successfully - isolated incident - achieving managers in succession is .. shall we say, borderline rose tinted.. but I like it.
Well how many managers have actually achieved something honestly impressive in the english game in the last 20 years?
You reguarly get smaller team winning the league cup or reaching a final or finishing 6th or 7th but mostly the rich clubs finish at the top and the poor clubs at the bottom and everyone basically does about as well as you'd expect.
There's been three hugely impressive feats at the top end (Ferguson maintaining Man U's domination over a 20 year period, Wenger going unbeaten through a league campaign and Benitez winning the CL with the crap that Benitez won the CL with) and there's been three impressive feats with poorer teams (Royle winning the FA cup with the crap Walker left him, Martinez winning it with the wigan squad and Moyes finishing 4th with a team that finished 17th the previous year while every other team in the league outspent him.)
Otherwise there hasn't really been any top managerial achievements. No clough or shankly who brough a team up from the lower leagues to the top of the european game. By and large most premier league managers are about as good as each other. It's only in the lower leagues where the difference between the good ones and the bad ones is really obvious.
It depends on what you class as impressive tbh. Everything is relative.
The gulf between the haves & have not's has widened significantly over the last 20 years & it's therefore made 'coming out of the pack' to challenge at the peak, neigh on impossible unless you have someone prepared to throw hundreds of £m's at it.
The game is more polarised financially now, so it makes managers achievements more relative to the resources they have at their disposal. Some of the managers of promoted clubs who've kept their sides up & then established them in the division, probably deserve as many plaudits as Matteo got for winning the CL.
But you're right, that the skill to win trophies with rich successful teams is one we prioritise more than the skill to keep poor unsuccessful teams competitive. And that might not be fair. Both are difficult.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.