We've got an owner who is prepared to be straightforward and give assurances when they are needed. So far he's always been upfront and usually right.
If the sticking point is the crazy valuation then the player would be frustrated. No one can know his long term value (but perhaps the figure should be re-valued upwards if he continues to produce the goods) - after all a release clause greater than 70 but lower than 90 will start to look cheap if he carries on getting 25 league goals a season.
Anyway - for now - I'm taking it as another player and his agent talking s...e. We've got him on a 2 year contract right now, for a lot less than the 140k he's apparently been offered, so presumably something will happen in good time.. either we'll get him to sign and stay a year at a time or we'll get circa 75M for him (with no hand-out to Chelsea, one hopes).
If the sticking point is the crazy valuation then the player would be frustrated. No one can know his long term value (but perhaps the figure should be re-valued upwards if he continues to produce the goods) - after all a release clause greater than 70 but lower than 90 will start to look cheap if he carries on getting 25 league goals a season.
Anyway - for now - I'm taking it as another player and his agent talking s...e. We've got him on a 2 year contract right now, for a lot less than the 140k he's apparently been offered, so presumably something will happen in good time.. either we'll get him to sign and stay a year at a time or we'll get circa 75M for him (with no hand-out to Chelsea, one hopes).