Lukaku V Kane and Barkley V Alli

[Simon baker]

Your logic only leads to the conclusion that Lukaku must be better than all those players because he played in an inferior team...

No don't be silly it means it's very difficult to actually know how good he is until he plays in a comparable team & that it needs to be factored into any discussion.

 

[AlE]

Kane > Lukaku, Barkley > Alli IMO.

All four are very good though, especially for their ages

 

[Jack1882]

There haven't been many better goalscorers than Lukaku. Even his harshest critics on here will rave to you about his goalscoring ability because it's genuinely superb.

I'm sorry but what evidence of that is there?

He hasn't even got 20 Prem goals in a season yet for Everton. That's including seasons where Everton qualified for the Champions League and were amazing so you can't even throw this inferior team nonsense.

Lukaku's strike rate up to this point is average. The numbers speak for themselves. Kane is going to have 3 20+ Prem goal seasons in a row before Lukaku gets to 1.

 

[Simon baker]

I'm sorry but what evidence of that is there?

He hasn't even got 20 Prem goals in a season yet for Everton. That's including seasons where Everton qualified for the Champions League and were amazing so you can't even throw this inferior team nonsense.

Lukaku's strike rate up to this point is average. The numbers speak for themselves. Kane is going to have 3 20+ Prem goal seasons in a row before Lukaku gets to 1.

We have never finished higher tHan fifth whilst lukaku has played for us.

we finished 11th the last two years running 11th do you comprehend that you think playing in a team that finishes 11th is the same as a team that finished 3rd did i mention we finished 11th

 

[Kev The Rat]

I'm sorry but what evidence of that is there?

He hasn't even got 20 Prem goals in a season yet for Everton. That's including seasons where Everton qualified for the Champions League and were amazing so you can't even throw this inferior team nonsense.

Lukaku's strike rate up to this point is average. The numbers speak for themselves. Kane is going to have 3 20+ Prem goal seasons in a row before Lukaku gets to 1.

Going back to Kane - I do believe he could struggle in an average/weak side. Can't be proved of course, just a gut feeling I have.

 

[paulbefc]

I'm sorry but what evidence of that is there?

He hasn't even got 20 Prem goals in a season yet for Everton. That's including seasons where Everton qualified for the Champions League and were amazing so you can't even throw this inferior team nonsense.

Lukaku's strike rate up to this point is average. The numbers speak for themselves. Kane is going to have 3 20+ Prem goal seasons in a row before Lukaku gets to 1.

Crikey. You haven't followed Everton closely in his time have you? We had one good season where we finished 5th. We then finished 11th twice in a row and were horrendous.

Simply read the last few pages of the thread rather than have me repeat myself. Everything you need is there.

 

[Tree13]

I disagree. Kane still contributes when not scoring. Rom is practically invisible. Kane would score less for Sunderland but would be an outlet for others and hold it up

Hmmmmmm.

Also,

PL assists since 2013:

Lukaku 21

Kane 9.

Here endeth the lesson.

 

[maccavennie]

I'm sorry but what evidence of that is there?

He hasn't even got 20 Prem goals in a season yet for Everton. That's including seasons where Everton qualified for the Champions League and were amazing so you can't even throw this inferior team nonsense.

Lukaku's strike rate up to this point is average. The numbers speak for themselves. Kane is going to have 3 20+ Prem goal seasons in a row before Lukaku gets to 1.

I'd love to know when we've qualified for the CL with Lukaku, please do tell.

 

[Boss_Blue]

I'm sorry but what evidence of that is there?

He hasn't even got 20 Prem goals in a season yet for Everton. That's including seasons where Everton qualified for the Champions League and were amazing so you can't even throw this inferior team nonsense.

Lukaku's strike rate up to this point is average. The numbers speak for themselves. Kane is going to have 3 20+ Prem goal seasons in a row before Lukaku gets to 1.

LOL.

Lukaku isn't Marcus Bent you bad racist.

 

[jinkyali]

Kane over Rom any day of the week.

Love Rom but Kane is superior in most departments I would argue.

 

[maccavennie]

Crikey. You haven't followed Everton closely in his time have you? We had one good season where we finished 5th. We then finished 11th twice in a row and were horrendous.

Simply read the last few pages of the thread rather than have me repeat myself. Everything you need is there.

I'm assuming Jack might have been born in 1882 like his name says and actually hasn't got a clue what's going on.

 

[Boss_Blue]

I'm sorry but what evidence of that is there?

He hasn't even got 20 Prem goals in a season yet for Everton. That's including seasons where Everton qualified for the Champions League and were amazing so you can't even throw this inferior team nonsense.

Lukaku's strike rate up to this point is average. The numbers speak for themselves. Kane is going to have 3 20+ Prem goal seasons in a row before Lukaku gets to 1.

Oh and Lukau has a one in two strike rate across his career so far.

Terrible that like.

 

[Ernie]

I'm sorry but what evidence of that is there?

He hasn't even got 20 Prem goals in a season yet for Everton. That's including seasons where Everton qualified for the Champions League and were amazing so you can't even throw this inferior team nonsense.

Lukaku's strike rate up to this point is average. The numbers speak for themselves. Kane is going to have 3 20+ Prem goal seasons in a row before Lukaku gets to 1.

The undertone of racism in your posts isnt nice to see at all

 

[catcherintherye]

I'm sorry but what evidence of that is there?

He hasn't even got 20 Prem goals in a season yet for Everton. That's including seasons where Everton qualified for the Champions League and were amazing so you can't even throw this inferior team nonsense.

Lukaku's strike rate up to this point is average. The numbers speak for themselves. Kane is going to have 3 20+ Prem goal seasons in a row before Lukaku gets to 1.

Mate lets have the stats right. Lukaku has double figures every season for the last 5 years. In all of them he has 16 + league goals barring 1 (where he got over 20 in all competitions). Look at Kanes last 5 years, not just his last 2 or 3 and you will see he is a million miles away from this level of consistency.

As you said, the numbers speak for themselves. Luck's consistency over a period that we should judge top players (i.e. 5 years not two and a half) is leagues apart from Kane's.

 

[Jack1882]

I messed up on the qualify for Champions League thing Everton finished 5th. My bad.

Everton were still up around 5th/6th for a number of years.

What is this racism accusation I'm getting right now? I don't understand what people are on about?

Look at Kanes last 5 years, not just his last 2 or 3 and you will see he is a million miles away from this level of consistency.

Huh? He wasn't even playing Premier League football?