Whatever we do we can't allow him to go in January.
I don't think we can put in a release clause with the Euros coming up. If he performs brilliantly from now till then and then has a good tournament the fee could look like a pittance.
A personal guarantee from Martinez that we won't hold on to him at all costs next summer and a pay rise is about all we can offer him at this stage.
Exactly this. Where would the benefit for Everton be with a release clause like that? £40m, you're kidding right. If there was a release clause to be added, it should start somewhere in the £60m region. If not, just let him stay on his current wages and cash in on him in one or two years.If he wants a release clause in a new contract then he wants out. Simply tell him he can have a pay rise but no release clause...or he stays on current deal and club decides price. At the end of the day the club comes first
It depends what the actual contract says but that's what we need to avoid.The problem is if we insert a buy out clause is that it can be met in January, then hes off.
That could leave us with an unhappy player.If he wants a release clause in a new contract then he wants out. Simply tell him he can have a pay rise but no release clause...or he stays on current deal and club decides price. At the end of the day the club comes first
Why would Stones (or his Agent) want to limit the sale price that low?If he wants a release clause in a new contract then he wants out. Simply tell him he can have a pay rise but no release clause...or he stays on current deal and club decides price. At the end of the day the club comes first
Will it? I think Chelsea offered that because they started to get desperate. We are still talking about a 21 year old CB who has never started in that position for his country.Why would Stones (or his Agent) want to limit the sale price that low?
Would have thought his agent would be pushing for a much higher buy-out as they know someone will eventually pay it.
Setting it at £38M-£40M would just means he'd be snapped up as soon as the next window opens, what's the point of a pay increase for three months?
I think Man Utd/City and others were certainly interested but respected our Club when it said he wasn't for sale.Will it? I think Chelsea offered that because they started to get desperate. We are still talking about a 21 year old CB who has never started in that position for his country.
I think there's a good chance that if Chelsea come back in then they will come in for less and hope Stones makes more of a fuss so they get him for cheaper. In a way this buy out would be if true an insurance policy so that won't happen.
I think Chelsea were the only ones bidding because the other clubs knew we valued him above what they would have paid.I think Man Utd/City and others were certainly interested but respected our Club when it said he wasn't for sale.
If the Club get to the point where they would accept the sale then I imagine the other clubs will be informed that we will entertain bids. Chelsea were only setting the bid price because they were the only ones bidding. When others are involved we'll see a better price.
He's not going to go down in value in the next 6-7 years
The problem is if we insert a buy out clause is that it can be met in January, then hes off.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.