Current Affairs Israel is an apartheid state

Status
Not open for further replies.
Both Russia and Israel are sovereign states engaged in unspeakable acts of violence and genocide.

Let's not get bogged down in who is scraping the barrel of humanity the furthest.
One can excuse a lot, if "better than Pol Pot" is the benchmark. The titleholder for "worst world leader of all time," "worst world leader right now" and "greatest player of all time" are all unworthy of serious debate, and best left to the bars and pubs in which they belong as drinking pastimes.
 
Both Russia and Israel are sovereign states engaged in unspeakable acts of violence and genocide.

Let's not get bogged down in who is scraping the barrel of humanity the furthest.
There's difference.

And if you want to broaden this out we can always bring isn the US in the Gulf.
 
Shades of atrocity I don't think worth quibbling over to be honest.
No, neither do I. But there's a difference between a policy of wiping out a whole population or at the very least purging them from their own territory on ethno-religious grounds and a superpower flexing their muscles to gain a geo-political advantage and secure interests in a part of the globe.
 
No, neither do I. But there's a difference between a policy of wiping out a whole population or at the very least purging them from their own territory on ethno-religious grounds and a superpower flexing their muscles to gain a geo-political advantage and secure interests in a part of the globe.

If you're part of a population being raped and murdered I'm not sure the difference is as great as you think it is.
 
It's greater in intensity and its ideologically driven and therefore much more difficult to reel back in...as the Gazan's are finding out now.

How are you quantifying this intensity?

What is the difference in difficulty between reeling in an ideological foe as opposed to a political one?

I feel it would be worth taking time to examine your objectivity and potential bias with regards to current events.
 
How are you quantifying this intensity?

What is the difference in difficulty between reeling in an ideological foe as opposed to a political one?

I feel it would be worth taking time to examine your objectivity and potential bias with regards to current events.
Because an ideological foe simply won't back away until the opponent is destroyed; a non-idealogical opponent is looking to maximise control and then seeks a way out via negotiation.
 
Because an ideological foe simply won't back away until the opponent is destroyed; a non-idealogical opponent is looking to maximise control and then seeks a way out via negotiation.

But in this particular circumstance you could say Russia's political motive is to take over Ukraine with an ideological overview to delete Ukrainian culture and as a sovereign state.

They aren't binary options.

Israel and Russia are both engaging in evil, genocidal and colonial ventures. Any attempt to grey the issues by comparison is unhelpful and quite frankly should be regarded with utmost suspicion.
 
But in this particular circumstance you could say Russia's political motive is to take over Ukraine with an ideological overview to delete Ukrainian culture and as a sovereign state.

They aren't binary options.

Israel and Russia are both engaging in evil, genocidal and colonial ventures. Any attempt to grey the issues by comparison is unhelpful and quite frankly should be regarded with utmost suspicion.
Well, not quite. Russia have used the spectre of stamping out 'nazism' in Ukraine as a pretext for territorial encroachment and a land grab there.

There was a nazi element to Ukraine's military but it was a flag of convenience for them to state that it was a strain that dominated the Ukrainian body politic.
 
Well, not quite. Russia have used the spectre of stamping out 'nazism' in Ukraine as a pretext for territorial encroachment and a land grab there.

There was a nazi element to Ukraine's military but it was a flag of convenience for them to state that it was a strain that dominated the Ukrainian body politic.

But again, if you are belonging to that populate would you really care about the ideological viewpoint of the person kidnapping your children/raping your wife/killing your family?

If the answer's yes then you really need to gain a sense of perspective.

I feel you're in danger of coming full circle with this argument. The semantics of who is the most genocidal is incidental, any attempt to blur the lines is suspicious.

In this respect I'm afraid I would urge all who visit this parish to view your opinions with a pinch of salt that would make a cardiologist wince.
 
But again, if you are belonging to that populate would you really care about the ideological viewpoint of the person kidnapping your children/raping your wife/killing your family?

If the answer's yes then you really need to gain a sense of perspective.

I feel you're in danger of coming full circle with this argument. The semantics of who is the most genocidal is incidental, any attempt to blur the lines is suspicious.

In this respect I'm afraid I would urge all who visit this parish to view your opinions with a pinch of salt that would make a cardiologist wince.
You're entitled to be wrong.

There's a hierarchy of inhumanity, like to or not, and regimes like Hitler's and Pol Pot's and Stalin's are quite obviously at the top end of it and apartheid regimes like South Africa's and Israel's are further down the tree but still ahead of regimes like Russia and the US who conduct imperial hot spot wars on occasion.
 
You're entitled to be wrong.

There's a hierarchy of inhumanity, like to or not, and regimes like Hitler's and Pol Pot's and Stalin's are quite obviously at the top end of it and apartheid regimes like South Africa's and Israel's are further down the tree but still ahead of regimes like Russia and the US who conduct imperial hot spot wars on occasion.

Playing Inhumanity Top Trumps is unhelpful and distasteful.

Thinking Ukrainian party politics trumps an invasion from a nuclear superpower is either politically biased or spectacular misjudgement either accidental or intentional for the purpose of being contrary.

We can dance like this all night, I feel your posts expose you more than you realise.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top