Current Affairs Irish Border and Brexit

Status
Not open for further replies.
as an aside, I work in education technology and you'd be surprised how many people still use a TI 84 calculator!
Your a poor teacher then!
Look the only Union that are preparing to try and make a hard border is the EU....
They are so scared if we leave the single market outlined clearly by the way in the Brexit campaign we will get deals and be independent to them it sets a president on how crap of an organisation they really are -
Here's reality for them if they don't accept a soft border let the UK trade worldwide they blow 40 billion of the UK meaning the remaining countries have to lay more membership- then the immediate tarrifs will cripple them more than us - fact - yes the UK will be hurt too!
Their negotiating stance is childish, and pathetic- Ireland will lose out too we have to pay over thousands of tarrifs being in the single market this is their way of using Ireland as a protection racket for themselves!
 
But that’s how technology develops. We have a need. Some solutions may exist. We want better. What’s the market. For this type of technology it could be worldwide, an electronic borderless planet. What will it take to develop, well throw £500M for basic models and another £1Bn for prototypes and £2-£3Bn for final product. I can think of a dozen German, French, Spanish, Italian and British companies who would jump at the opportunity and will promise models by Christmas, prototypes by 2019 and final product by the time we finally leave. Anything can be done, it just needs imagination and money.......
You said all that 3 months ago yet here we are with no viable plan.
 
Your a poor teacher then!
Look the only Union that are preparing to try and make a hard border is the EU....
They are so scared if we leave the single market outlined clearly by the way in the Brexit campaign we will get deals and be independent to them it sets a president on how crap of an organisation they really are -
Here's reality for them if they don't accept a soft border let the UK trade worldwide they blow 40 billion of the UK meaning the remaining countries have to lay more membership- then the immediate tarrifs will cripple them more than us - fact - yes the UK will be hurt too!
Their negotiating stance is childish, and pathetic- Ireland will lose out too we have to pay over thousands of tarrifs being in the single market this is their way of using Ireland as a protection racket for themselves!
If I was a teacher I wouldn’t be on here half as much ;)
 
You said all that 3 months ago yet here we are with no viable plan.

Because the EU don’t really want a solution and are rejecting proposals out of hand. Even if everything existed and was in place they would not accept it. They want to keep NI tied to the EU and by extension the rest of the U.K. tied to its rules. It won’t let go or negotiate sensibly at the moment it seems....
 
The clock is ticking for May. The DUP have threatened to bring down her government, if she allows the north of the island of Ireland to remain in the customs union and the single market and not the rest of the UK.


Ireland
Irish EU commissioner urges May to rethink customs union stance


Phil Hogan to call for a ‘softening of the red lines’ between Brexiters and remainers

Lisa O'Carroll

@lisaocarroll
Thu 26 Apr 2018 06.00 BSTLast modified on Thu 26 Apr 2018 06.01 BST


Phil Hogan says recent comments from Brexiter Jacob Rees-Mogg about Ireland’s beef trade were ‘unhelpful and irresponsible’. Photograph: John Thys/AFP/Getty Images
Ireland’s EU commissioner has urged Theresa May to face down the “immoderate ideology” of Brexiters and reconsider her position on remaining in a customs union with the EU.

Phil Hogan, the commissioner for agriculture, will tell the senate in the Irish parliament on Thursday that remarks by Jacob Rees-Mogg about Ireland’s beef trade with Britain were “unhelpful and irresponsible”.

Speaking earlier this week, Rees-Mogg said the UK was in a much stronger negotiating position than May would have parliament believe and called for her to be “much firmer and clearer” about the damage to the EU if Britain crashes out without a deal.

“If we were to apply the common external tariff on Irish beef, the Irish agricultural industry is in serious trouble. You’ve got to ask the EU: does it want to sacrifice the economy of Ireland on the altar of EU ideology? My guess is that the answer is no, and therefore we are in a very strong negotiating position,” he said.

He added the government should abandon the customs partnership concept, declaring it “completely cretinous”.

Hogan is expected to say on Thursday that such remarks highlight a continuing rift in London between Brexiters and remainers. He will say: “Both sides should compare and honestly weigh the costs and benefits of a free trade agreement versus a customs union. This is a moment for balanced judgment, not costly immoderate ideology.

“Some form of customs arrangement and softening of the red lines must be in the best interest of all concerned.”

He will say he recognises that the UK’s objective is to achieve a better future for its citizens, but that this “cannot be achieved on a wing and a prayer”.

The commissioner will also confirm that the EU has “sent the UK back to the drawing board on the Irish border” and it must come up with new ideas before June.

His remarks come hours after Brexit secretary David Davis said he believed the Irish border conundrum would remain wrapped up in wider talks and would not be resolved until October.

Hogan will warn that the June target set by the EU for fresh ideas on the border has not moved and has consequences.

“No decision on the Irish border, no withdrawal treaty, no withdrawal treaty, no transition,” he will say.

His words chime with those of Michel Barnier last week, after proposals on the Irish border were comprehensively rejected by the EU".
 
This government, and the civil service, really don't have a clue about the Good Friday Agreement. The Tories, and the civil servants who advise them, are out of their depth.

Home Office withdraws Border Force job ads over discrimination fears ...

Northern Ireland
Home Office withdraws Border Force job ads over discrimination fears


Equality Commission for Northern Ireland says requirement for British passport is potentially unlawful

Lisa O'Carroll Brexit correspondent

@lisaocarroll
Wed 25 Apr 2018 17.17 BSTLast modified on Wed 25 Apr 2018 17.26 BST


The government was attempting to recruit 1,000 Border Force officials. Photograph: Steve Parsons/PA
The government has withdrawn a recruitment campaign for 1,000 Border Force officers after discrimination concerns were raised in Northern Ireland because the jobs were restricted to British passport holders.

The Equality Commission for Northern Ireland contacted the Home Office to point out the adverts were potentially unlawful under the Good Friday agreement.

Eileen Lavery, head of advice and compliance at the commission, said the Home Office recruitment “could exclude a large section of the Northern Ireland population who identify as Irish, hold no UK passport and, in many cases, hold an Irish passport”.

Labour’s Northern Ireland spokesman, Tony Lloyd, also raised concerns about the government’s commitment to the Good Friday agreement and to having no hard border after Brexit.

The jobs are being advertised as part of a drive to have more than 1,300 additional border staff in place for the end of the transition period in 2020.

Among the posts advertised were 21 in Belfast. The jobs were described as “reserved post”, which are restricted “to UK nationals, ie: British citizens, British subjects under part IV of the British Nationality Act 1981”.

The Equality Commission had discussed legislation in Northern Ireland with the Home Office in January but the passport issue did not arise until the adverts were posted online last week.

The Home Office withdrew the ads immediately and said it would relaunch them with the correct wording.

It said an error had occurred when the roles were advertised and it had incorrectly stated that eligibility was based on having a “full and valid British passport” instead of “full and valid passport”.

Fewer than 900,000 people identify as British in Northern Ireland, with a further 533,000 identifying as Northern Irish and 513,000 identifying as Irish, according to the 2011 census.

The Democratic Unionist party MP for East Belfast, Gavin Robinson, described the row as “noise” and has written to the home secretary, Amber Rudd, for clarification on recruitment policy in Northern Ireland.

“The news that the government plans to recruit Border Force staff in Northern Ireland is a clear admission they share our concerns that they may not to live up to their commitments on the future of the UK-Ireland border post-Brexit,” he told the Irish News.

No legal action is being taken as the Home Office removed the adverts immediately.

It is the second time the Home Office has been caught out by the special arrangements in Northern Ireland for those who identify as Irish. A Derry woman won a court case in relation to her American husband on the grounds that she was an Irish passport holder and her spouse was not required to go through immigration procedures for third-country nationals'.

Not surprising they haven't a clue about the Good Friday Agreement after this court case in February clearly shows. But they still ploughed on with the Border force ad.

Northern Ireland
Derry woman's US-born husband free to live in UK, court rules


Tribunal finds Emma de Souza can be treated as Irish citizen under Good Friday agreement

Lisa O'Carroll Brexit correspondent

@lisaocarroll
Mon 12 Feb 2018 11.26 GMTLast modified on Mon 12 Feb 2018 22.01 GMT


Jake de Souza and his wife, Emma de Souza. The case could have implications for any Irish passport holder married to an non-EU citizen, lawyers say. Photograph: Emma de Souza
A potential loophole in Britain’s strict immigration laws has been exposed after the Home office lost a case in Northern Ireland that hinged on the unique peace deal rights that allow citizens to identify as Irish and not British.

A Derry woman at the centre of the case has spoken of her joy after a Belfast court rejected the Home Office’s bid to appeal against a recent ruling that her American husband should be allowed to live in the UK without going through immigration procedures because she carried an Irish passport.

The Home Office has been told that it cannot appeal against the decision on the grounds that “no error in law” was made by the first-tier tribunal in Belfast.

“I feel elated and quite vindicated,” said de Souza.

The extraordinary immigration case hinged on the 1998 Good Friday agreement, which allows citizens to be identified as Irish, British or both and could have implications for any Irish passport holder married to an non-EU citizen, lawyers say.

Emma de Souza found herself at the centre of a legal battle after her application in 2015 for a residence card for her US-born husband, Jake de Souza, was rejected.



The Home Office initially rejected his application on the grounds that his wife was British, even though she never carried a British passport.

They said as she was born in Northern Ireland, under the British Nationality Act 1981 she was automatically deemed British and would have to apply through the normal routes for third country citizens. The Home Office told Mr De Souza the only way they could deal with his case was for his wife to “renounce her status as a British citizen”.

De Souza challenged that decision on the grounds that his wife had the right to be treated as an Irish citizen under the Good Friday agreement and was therefore an EU citizen exercising her freedom of movement rights.

The first-tier tribunal ruled in his favour.

“Under the terms of the Good Friday Agreement, people of Northern Ireland are in a unique position within the United Kingdom. The British and Irish governments recognised the birthright of all the people of Northern Ireland to identify themselves as Irish or British, or both,” said Judge Gillespie in his conclusion at the tribunal.

“Initially I had a lot of people I know say, ‘but the Home Office is right, you are British, just sign the form to denounce being British and make the application,’” said Ms De Souza.

“But I feel very strongly that I am Irish. I grew up in the Troubles and as a child I experienced the sectarian violence and then to be told that you can’t identify as Irish? I felt like even though the Good Friday Agreement upholds my rights, I felt I was being classed as a lesser identity,” she said.

“I wanted to take a stand not just for me, but for others,” added De Souza.

The Home Office appealed against the tribunal’s decision but was told this week that as there was “no error in law” it could not do so in that court.

However it has the right to go direct to the higher court, the upper tribunal to argue that an important point in law needs to be tested.

A spokesman for the Home Office said it was examining the ruling and considering whether to appeal".

I think the UK will not leave the customs union and the single market and May is looking for an 'excuse' not to.
 
Downing Street warned about Brexit border plan by head of Northern Ireland civil service
Exclusive David Sterling wrote to Olly Robbins to raise a number of practical issues with the UK plan

The head of Northern Ireland’s civil service has privately warned Downing Street that the UK’s plan for the Irish border fails to solve the major problems caused by Brexit.

In a leaked private letter to Theresa May‘s Brexit chief seen by The Independent, David Sterling said the plans in the UK’s position paper on the Irish border suffered from a number of practical problems and did not address certain “issues”.

He also raised concerns that Whitehall was not engaging closely enough with local NI officials with a good understanding of issues like the Good Friday Agreement and North-South cooperation.




Irish border Brexit solution needed by June, Guy Verhofstadt says
The customs proposals, which the UK government has still been trying to sell to EU negotiators Brussels as recently as last week, were first laid out in an official position paper on Northern Ireland and customs published in August last year.

Days after the paper was released Mr Sterling wrote to Olly Robbins, at the time permanent secretary of the Brexit department, to voice his concerns about its content. Downing Street, where Mr Robbins now heads up the Brexit unit, however confirmed last week that UK negotiators are still arguing for the solutions proposed in the position papers in talks, stating that “the two proposals we have put forward remain the basis for our negotiation position”.

The same proposals interrogated by Mr Sterling in the letter were reportedly rubbished by EU officials during the talks and subjected to a “systematic and forensic annihilation” during meetings with the European Commission in Brussels.

The letter to Mr Robbins, dated 23 August 2017 says: “While the position papers have helpfully started a dialogue on movement of goods, many of the issues raised in June still require exploration.”

While the position papers have helpfully started a dialogue on movement of goods, many of the issues raised in June still require exploration
David Sterling, head of the Northern Ireland civil service
In the letter the top official in Northern Ireland also appears to be frustrated by a lack of involvement of local officials in drawing up the policy, stating that “we would like to see a more intensive and open engagement between Whitehall and NICS [Northern Ireland Civil Service] officials”. He goes on to list seven areas in which Whitehall had not been taking full advantage of local knowledge, including on the Good Friday Agreement, North-South cooperation, and trade.

Going into detail about the issues with the UK customs proposals, Mr Sterling said plans to exempt small businesses from customs suffered from issues of practicality.

“The dividing line between businesses of different sizes in Northern Ireland supply chains will undoubtedly be blurred. This could make it difficult to accurately define which businesses are exempt from customs processes,” he said.


“For example, bulk tankers owned or contracted by Irish milk processing firms collect raw milk from multiple farms in Northern Ireland before returning to Irish processing facilities.”

1b.png

He adds: “Small businesses trading on the island of Ireland may also be using inputs from outside these islands, or be part of an island of Ireland supply chain that ultimately sells into world markets.”

The NI executive civil service chief also highlighted concerns with plans for a “robust enforcement mechanism” to keep goods from crossing the border.

“The visibility and impact of a ‘robust enforcement mechanism’ to ensure goods not complying with the EU’s trade policy (whether through a lower tariff or diverging standard) stay in the UK is a significant challenge,” he said.

“The example of Turkey illustrates that customs duties are only one part of the picture and technical barriers can be equally disruptive to trade. Potential trade barriers created by diverging tariffs or regulatory standards are therefore a key area for ongoing discussion. DAERA is currently engaged with DEFRA on complex sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) issues. “

2.png

In a separate leaked document also seen by The Independent, an internal economic analysis drawn up by the Northern Ireland executive’s Department for the Economy warns that the province’s economy will suffer because of Brexit whatever solution is applied.

“There is no quick or simple solution to the land border,” the assessment, dated May 2017 says. “There is likely to be some negative impact on the economy whether border controls are sited at the land or sea border, at least in the short-to-medium term. The policy question is therefore how these impacts can be minimised and what transitional support is required.”

3.png

The Government has declined to comment on the leaks.

There has still be little progress on the border question in talks this year, despite the opening of talks about the future relationship last week.

Under the Good Friday Agreement there can be no hard border between the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland, and both sides agree that none should return.

The EU however says the customs union and single market must have external border checks to maintain their integrity. Commission negotiators effectively proposed moving the customs checks to the Irish seat between Great Britain and Northern Ireland, but Theresa May refused the approach after pressure from her allies in the DUP.

Brexit threatens life on the Irish border: in pictures
The draft withdrawal agreement as envisaged by the EU says Britain can either come up with a specific solution to the border problem, remove the need for a hard border by negotiating a close trade relationship with the EU, or revert to a “backstop” option that would keep Britain in full alignment with relevant EU regulations.

But with Ms May having rules out membership of the customs union and single market the chance of solving the issue using the future relationship looks slim, barring a U-turn.

Speaking in the European Parliament in Brussels on Wednesday Guy Verhofstadt, the body’s Brexit coordinator, said he believed a solution the border problem was needed by the end of June. UK Brexit secretary David Davis said earlier this week that he was aiming for October.

Mr Verhofstadt said negotiators “still have no proposal made by the UK side that could be a satisfactory solution for the problem”.
 
Downing Street warned about Brexit border plan by head of Northern Ireland civil service
Exclusive David Sterling wrote to Olly Robbins to raise a number of practical issues with the UK plan

The head of Northern Ireland’s civil service has privately warned Downing Street that the UK’s plan for the Irish border fails to solve the major problems caused by Brexit.

In a leaked private letter to Theresa May‘s Brexit chief seen by The Independent, David Sterling said the plans in the UK’s position paper on the Irish border suffered from a number of practical problems and did not address certain “issues”.

He also raised concerns that Whitehall was not engaging closely enough with local NI officials with a good understanding of issues like the Good Friday Agreement and North-South cooperation.




Irish border Brexit solution needed by June, Guy Verhofstadt says
The customs proposals, which the UK government has still been trying to sell to EU negotiators Brussels as recently as last week, were first laid out in an official position paper on Northern Ireland and customs published in August last year.

Days after the paper was released Mr Sterling wrote to Olly Robbins, at the time permanent secretary of the Brexit department, to voice his concerns about its content. Downing Street, where Mr Robbins now heads up the Brexit unit, however confirmed last week that UK negotiators are still arguing for the solutions proposed in the position papers in talks, stating that “the two proposals we have put forward remain the basis for our negotiation position”.

The same proposals interrogated by Mr Sterling in the letter were reportedly rubbished by EU officials during the talks and subjected to a “systematic and forensic annihilation” during meetings with the European Commission in Brussels.

The letter to Mr Robbins, dated 23 August 2017 says: “While the position papers have helpfully started a dialogue on movement of goods, many of the issues raised in June still require exploration.”

While the position papers have helpfully started a dialogue on movement of goods, many of the issues raised in June still require exploration
David Sterling, head of the Northern Ireland civil service
In the letter the top official in Northern Ireland also appears to be frustrated by a lack of involvement of local officials in drawing up the policy, stating that “we would like to see a more intensive and open engagement between Whitehall and NICS [Northern Ireland Civil Service] officials”. He goes on to list seven areas in which Whitehall had not been taking full advantage of local knowledge, including on the Good Friday Agreement, North-South cooperation, and trade.

Going into detail about the issues with the UK customs proposals, Mr Sterling said plans to exempt small businesses from customs suffered from issues of practicality.

“The dividing line between businesses of different sizes in Northern Ireland supply chains will undoubtedly be blurred. This could make it difficult to accurately define which businesses are exempt from customs processes,” he said.


“For example, bulk tankers owned or contracted by Irish milk processing firms collect raw milk from multiple farms in Northern Ireland before returning to Irish processing facilities.”

1b.png

He adds: “Small businesses trading on the island of Ireland may also be using inputs from outside these islands, or be part of an island of Ireland supply chain that ultimately sells into world markets.”

The NI executive civil service chief also highlighted concerns with plans for a “robust enforcement mechanism” to keep goods from crossing the border.

“The visibility and impact of a ‘robust enforcement mechanism’ to ensure goods not complying with the EU’s trade policy (whether through a lower tariff or diverging standard) stay in the UK is a significant challenge,” he said.

“The example of Turkey illustrates that customs duties are only one part of the picture and technical barriers can be equally disruptive to trade. Potential trade barriers created by diverging tariffs or regulatory standards are therefore a key area for ongoing discussion. DAERA is currently engaged with DEFRA on complex sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) issues. “

2.png

In a separate leaked document also seen by The Independent, an internal economic analysis drawn up by the Northern Ireland executive’s Department for the Economy warns that the province’s economy will suffer because of Brexit whatever solution is applied.

“There is no quick or simple solution to the land border,” the assessment, dated May 2017 says. “There is likely to be some negative impact on the economy whether border controls are sited at the land or sea border, at least in the short-to-medium term. The policy question is therefore how these impacts can be minimised and what transitional support is required.”

3.png

The Government has declined to comment on the leaks.

There has still be little progress on the border question in talks this year, despite the opening of talks about the future relationship last week.

Under the Good Friday Agreement there can be no hard border between the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland, and both sides agree that none should return.

The EU however says the customs union and single market must have external border checks to maintain their integrity. Commission negotiators effectively proposed moving the customs checks to the Irish seat between Great Britain and Northern Ireland, but Theresa May refused the approach after pressure from her allies in the DUP.

Brexit threatens life on the Irish border: in pictures
The draft withdrawal agreement as envisaged by the EU says Britain can either come up with a specific solution to the border problem, remove the need for a hard border by negotiating a close trade relationship with the EU, or revert to a “backstop” option that would keep Britain in full alignment with relevant EU regulations.

But with Ms May having rules out membership of the customs union and single market the chance of solving the issue using the future relationship looks slim, barring a U-turn.

Speaking in the European Parliament in Brussels on Wednesday Guy Verhofstadt, the body’s Brexit coordinator, said he believed a solution the border problem was needed by the end of June. UK Brexit secretary David Davis said earlier this week that he was aiming for October.

Mr Verhofstadt said negotiators “still have no proposal made by the UK side that could be a satisfactory solution for the problem”.
Armed with that knowledge, is it any wonder David Davis sneaked into Armagh for his border photo opportunity rather than actually engage with the people nevermind our elected representatives.

As an aside to that, the village Davis visited had just had the news that it’s main employer was laying off more that 50 staff due to a downturn in trade. I bet he didn’t even know that.
 
Armed with that knowledge, is it any wonder David Davis sneaked into Armagh for his border photo opportunity rather than actually engage with the people nevermind our elected representatives.

As an aside to that, the village Davis visited had just had the news that it’s main employer was laying off more that 50 staff due to a downturn in trade. I bet he didn’t even know that.

I doubt many British politician know what is in the Good Friday Agreement and the Northern Ireland Act 1989. You can definitely see that the Tories haven't a clue, hence the Border force add and the Derry woman's victory, against the Home Office, due to the Good Friday Agreement. The one thing May is correct on is that, and said it before the vote, 'if the UK leaves the EU there will have to be a physical border on the island of Ireland'. That would have been a certainty.

But to do that May will have to repeal the Northern Ireland act and tear up the Good Friday Agreement. The Americans will not allow this to happen, hence Mitchell coming over before the anniversary celebrations. More and more there is the move towards accepting special status and the DUP know it, that is why they threatened to bring down the government if 'the Northern Ireland is treated any differently to the rest of the UK'. Cue, the latest 'have to stay in the EU's customs union and single market' debate in parliament.

The one thing guaranteed is that there will not be a physical border on the island of Ireland.
 
I doubt many British politician know what is in the Good Friday Agreement and the Northern Ireland Act 1989. You can definitely see that the Tories haven't a clue, hence the Border force add and the Derry woman's victory, against the Home Office, due to the Good Friday Agreement. The one thing May is correct on is that, and said it before the vote, 'if the UK leaves the EU there will have to be a physical border on the island of Ireland'. That would have been a certainty.

But to do that May will have to repeal the Northern Ireland act and tear up the Good Friday Agreement. The Americans will not allow this to happen, hence Mitchell coming over before the anniversary celebrations. More and more there is the move towards accepting special status and the DUP know it, that is why they threatened to bring down the government if 'the Northern Ireland is treated any differently to the rest of the UK'. Cue, the latest 'have to stay in the EU's customs union and single market' debate in parliament.

The one thing guaranteed is that there will not be a physical border on the island of Ireland.
This series of Home Office blunders really isn’t inspiring confidence that the complexities of the border have been understood.
 
Arlene 'cash for ash' Foster is now whinging that the 'EU are not listening to us'. The DUP don't like the message that the north of the island of Ireland will not be leaving the customs union, the single market and the European Court of Justice jurisdiction.

N. Irelandselected



Barnier 'doesn't understand' unionist stance, says DUP
  • 2 hours ago

Media captionDUP leader Arlene Foster: Brexit negotiations have 'become aggressive'
DUP leader Arlene Foster has told the BBC that the EU's chief Brexit negotiator "does not understand" the unionist position in Northern Ireland.

Monday marks the start of Michel Barnier's two-day visit to Ireland, which comes amid rising tensions over the future UK-Ireland border.

Mr Barnier said the UK is contradicting itself over its Irish border policy.

But Mrs Foster believes Mr Barnier does not understand the dispute and is "not an honest broker".

_101096591_045358417-1.jpg
Image copyrightREUTERS
Image captionArlene Foster has warned Michel Barnier the DUP will not accept Northern Ireland being treated differently to the rest of the UK
In December, the UK and EU reached a political agreement in which the UK committed to protecting north-south cooperation on the island of Ireland.

It also guaranteed there would be no hard border, including physical infrastructure or related checks and controls.

However, the EU's proposed backstop solution to avoid a hard border - keeping Northern Ireland in the customs union after Brexit - continues to be at odds with what the UK government and the DUP say they would accept.

Mrs Foster told BBC political editor Laura Kuenssberg the DUP would not accept Northern Ireland being treated differently to the rest of the UK.

She said: "Michel Barnier's trying to present himself as someone who cares deeply about Northern Ireland and if that is the case he needs to hear the fact that we are part of the United Kingdom [and] will remain part of the United Kingdom constitutionally, politically and economically.

"Therefore his proposal of us being in an all-Ireland regulatory scenario with a border down the Irish Sea simply does not work.

"It does not work constitutionally, politically and it certainly does not work from an economic perspective."

p05pp1dg.jpg


Media captionThe Irish border bridge where stakes are high
Mrs Foster added: "We've tried to get him to understand the unionist position for the people of Northern Ireland but he hasn't really responded and I'm disappointed about that.

"I don't think he does understand the wider unionist culture of Northern Ireland."

Mr Barnier is due to meet Irish Prime Minister Leo Varadkar on Monday and will also speak to business leaders on both sides of the Irish border during his trip".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top