peteblue
Welcome back Wayne
Because in the end someone will need to pay for it and it won't be Japanese tax payers
Correct and neither will it be UK taxpayers.....
Because in the end someone will need to pay for it and it won't be Japanese tax payers
This is all very valid, the "immigrants are putting tremendous strain on our country" agenda has been peddled by a large portion of the media, the UKIP and the anti-immigrant/eurosceptic faction of the conservatives for a very long time, but on balance, it is clear that free movement of people has contributed more to the country than it has cost.
Give us the oncost of immigration on housing benefits, tax credits, child tax credit which the latter is paid even if they go home?
Migration will still happen if we leave the EU as we have a skill shortage ATM so what's wrong in a visa based card for movement?Would be more interested in data on the number of business owning immigrants, and the number of people they employ.
Y'know, like Easy Jet. (Not a clue if he was an immigrant mind, might just be based here for all I know).
Migration will still happen if we leave the EU as we have a skill shortage ATM so what's wrong in a visa based card for movement?
Why is that so wrong having control of immigration?
Yeah, I know mate, Bruce told me a while back......I'm blaming my manflu.....

Give us the oncost of immigration on housing benefits, tax credits, child tax credit which the latter is paid even if they go home?
Then it's down to the negotiations you can not be in the single market per say but you can trade in it with common sense agreement outside the EU it's as simple as that Blair and Peter Mandelson and Clegg are worrying about their EU pensions !Dont think it is wrong per se, but if it secures free access to the EU for trade, imo, that is of far greater benefit than the cost of free movement.
Like I have said, over and over, I voted Stay with little enthusiasm.
It wasn't me that posted it, although it is quite momentous to be mistaken for Clint.



The oncost of immigration are not recorded though as I mentioned!Treasury minister Jim O'Neill claimed that figures were not available (February 2016). Convenient really as the real figures show very clearly that immigration benefits UK taxpayers. Independent studies show contributions of £3bn in taxes as gains £0.5bn in benefits paid.
Child benefit payments abroad is always flagged by those with a negative view of immigration, yet at £27 million it accounts for 0.0004% of government spending.
Even the Office for budgetary responsibility concede that UK plc would face severe labour shortages without the immigrant workforce that exists here.
The 'immigrant' related misinformation generated by the right wing media over recent years is nothing short of disgraceful and so counterproductive to our nation's well-being, economically and socially.
It's also wealth distributive in that they contribute to their home economies through the results of their labours here. That should be encouraged, the stronger the weaker/less resourced countries of Europe become then the stronger Europe becomes as a whole.
Then it's down to the negotiations you can not be in the single market per say but you can trade in it with common sense agreement outside the EU it's as simple as that Blair and Peter Mandelson and Clegg are worrying about their EU pensions !
Who then? Nissan?Correct and neither will it be UK taxpayers.....
Just take a look at Norways deal,you know the one we were told was the model we should look to replicate.We can have access if it's agreed without being in the EU!
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.