Much as it might suit your argument, I suspect that bending the rules for a country somewhat smaller than Widnes is a little bit different than with a country of over 60 million inhabitants.I posted this a while ago
Much as it might suit your argument, I suspect that bending the rules for a country somewhat smaller than Widnes is a little bit different than with a country of over 60 million inhabitants.I posted this a while ago
Much as it might suit your argument, I suspect that bending the rules for a country somewhat smaller than Widnes is a little bit different than with a country of over 60 million inhabitants.
Much as it might suit your argument, I suspect that bending the rules for a country somewhat smaller than Widnes is a little bit different than with a country of over 60 million inhabitants.
All things are possible depending on how it effects Germany......
"French president Francois Hollande, German chancellor Angela Merkel and Italian prime minister Matteo Renzi will hold "a summit or a meeting" at the end of August, Hollande announced on Wednesday during a cabinet meeting. The three leaders, who already met in Berlin after the Brexit vote at the end of June, intend to make proposals for the future of the EU-27 after the UK exit."
Airbus
The fact is access to the single market does not always require free movement of people.
America has access but no free movement of people.
"About a fifth of all cars produced in Germany last year, or around 820,000 vehicles, were exported to the UK, making it the single biggest destination by volume."
You have hit the nail on the head. The world is changing and if it's not globalization then it's going to be automation. It's pretty clear that the economy is going to need less and less unskilled labour in the short term which is why importing more and more unskilled labour is folly.
Eventually and probably in not that long a time the jobs will simply dry up and what then?
Will the new arrivals continue to be a net gain or a net loss. Who will pay if it is a net loss? The middle class or the wealthy?
It was the EU that let China dump steel USA and other countries put a massive tariffs to protect their steel industries 50 percent etc EU 10 percent we were helpless why because we belong to a rubbish polictical Union indecent countries seen it coming and protected their steel industries!
Our small manufacturing industries can now aim high to expand away from the throttling red tape of Brussels fetch it on world wide we will negotiate the single market within the EU with no casual freedom of movement and use the EU what it was supposed to be just a trading block!
It was the EU that let China dump steel USA and other countries put a massive tariffs to protect their steel industries 50 percent etc EU 10 percent we were helpless why because we belong to a rubbish polictical Union indecent countries seen it coming and protected their steel industries!
Our small manufacturing industries can now aim high to expand away from the throttling red tape of Brussels fetch it on world wide we will negotiate the single market within the EU with no casual freedom of movement and use the EU what it was supposed to be just a trading block!
It definitely does need to be had but don't think this is a problem that will not effect all educational levels of society. The poorly educated are just the first that will feel the brunt but only the corporate ownership class will ultimately be immune from the change.I guess the point I was trying to make is that this is a discussion that needs to be had, regardless of the origins of particular people in our society. Even with no migrants, if machines take away a lot of low-skilled work then the lot of the poorly educated is not going to be a good one.
For the record, I am largely in favour of automation. With cars, for instance, they will be considerably safer, make transportation greener and more affordable, whilst offering mobility to a wider range of people and increasing the productivity of the world enormously. But they will take away the largest profession for lowly skilled males in the western world (driving). That's just one industry, and I'm not sure policy makers are really on top of the repercussions yet.
I'm very much in favour of facing reality rather than shying away from it, and regard technological advancement as positive for the world as the free movement of people is. Just as the luddites didn't improve their lot by smashing the looms, I don't think smashing the EU will improve the lot of the poorly skilled people in Britain today.
Well the USA just slapped a 50 percent import on steel no need to go near ChinaDavid Davies the new Brexit minister goes to China and knocks on the door and asks the Chinese for a trade agreement. The first thing the Chinese say is, 'can we dump steel in the UK'. Davies says, 'no you cannot'. The Chinese turn around and say, 'close the door on your way out'.
Well the USA just slapped a 50 percent import on steel no need to go near China
Why not shackled by a narrow EU curruption parliament![]()
bit hypocritical by the yanks.
Back in the day - bear in mind how close we are to Sheffield. I'd ring up my Engineering supplies seller to order some key steel, which is precision stuff and they'd send me out stuff labelled 'made in the usa'
Exactly they preserved protected their steel industry we are restricted because the EU polictical elite sold our steel industry's down the river! With a pathetic levy unfair fuel prices to produce it!
Indeed. It's early days on this one yet but already certain news stories are being written by bots (i.e. automatically).It definitely does need to be had but don't think this is a problem that will not effect all educational levels of society. The poorly educated are just the first that will feel the brunt but only the corporate ownership class will ultimately be immune from the change.
The ex chancellor Gideon has paid the price rightly with his job as May sets to butcher the Nottinghill set let see if we can get our manufacturing back in years to come!Get it right Joey. The UK government didn't want any restrictions on Chinese steel coming into the EU/UK. Could have had something to do with the £1 billion Chinese investment in Manchester.
"The Government has been accused of “failing to protect” British steel by blocking EU plans to impose tougher sanctions on “aggressive” Chinese steel dumping while the industry stands on the brink of collapse.
EU Council working party papers seen show the UK is one of 14 countries that, as early as 2014, were seeking to block the EU from axing the so-called “lesser duty” rule, which could allow increased tariffs to be placed on cheap imports".
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.