Yes, and that would explain why Boris seems to be planning some "unusual for a Tory" public spending giveaways on the NHS, Police, education and infrastructure.
Outspending Labour? Got to appeal somehow.
To be honest Labour defeated the Conservatives on the economy at the last election (and in the lead up to it). McDonnell did a very good job as did the economists around him of putting a measured and costed plan which the public likes.
Tactically the Conservatives had a number of own goals, which kind of helped that situation. Not costing their manifesto was ridiculous. The line they had employed before, with a lot of success, that Labour were profligate and untrustworthy with the economy could hardly be repeated if you can't be bothered to stick some figures on a bit of paper.
More broadly I always thought May's initial gambit of moving away from Austerity, delivering for working people etc was also really stupid. It gave them a short term boost, but as people recognised it wouldn't be delivered they just became more frustrated. I think you will see similar with Johnson, but in truth the initial bounce has been nowhere near as strong for him.
Ironically the outspending Labour is a bold ploy but in some ways a sensible one. The problem is that it legitimises Corbyn's message and Corbyn. You can't on the one hand start dreaming up more spending than Labour, but then at the same time refer to his economic message as a Marxist one. There's little consistency with the message. You also have to acknowledge that in order to deliver said spending increases it will be very difficult to do so without tax increases, especially given we are hurtling towards another recession (and growth figures are down).
Johnson will not have the skill, or humility to navigate the conservatives through these choppy waters. I'd advise anybody to watch the Thatcher documentary on BBC if you want to see how a pro navigates the Tories through times of difficulty. The difference is stark.
But yes, Cummings and Johnson have a clear plan. The problem is (and I actually rate Cummings) his policy doesn't translate particularly well outside of a binary choice found in a referendum. I think an implosion could come from him, as many who know him see him as quite an intense charged individual and such people rarely respond well to being out of their depth.
