peteblue
Welcome back Wayne
Well Pete, like most things it's more nuanced that you are seemingly able to understand. You seem to read the question as 'people didn't know why they voted Leave'. But that's not how I read it.
You see, 'Leave' isn't one thing. Leave and do what? Leave and join EFTA to retain the economic security of the Bloc? Leave with no thought for the consequences to the rest of the country because "I'm alright Jack"? Leave and immediately deport anyone whose grandparents weren't born here? Leave and declare war on France to recapture Calais? No matter how self-righteously assured you feel in the reasons for your own vote, you don't actually speak for all 17m Leave voters.
So, like the recent Pie video posited, you could take 1000 Leave voters and ask them for their deep-seated reason to Leave and where they want to end up, and come up with 1000 different answers. Now, whatever position the government took, it can't satisfy all of these different opinions, many of which would be mutually exclusive. Therefore saying 'people didn't know what they were voting for' is correct, in that people dididn't know how the process of a Leave vote would play out and how the targeted endpoint matched their expectation.
Well if we are talking about nuance, the comment you quoted was in response to a comment regarding the understanding of SF voters.
However, taking the comment in isolation, your ‘understanding’ of leave seems only to cover rejoining part of it or taking extreme actions regarding Europeans, when in fact it was nothing of the sort. I not only agree that I don’t speak for the 17.4M leave voters, but have categorically stated so many times within this thread.
You correctly point out that Leave means different things to different leave voters, yet somehow ignore that Remain meant differing things for each remain voter. Remain and become part of an EU Army, remain and eventually join the Euro...where does it end.......