Four disproven lies leep to mind.
1) Turkey being the first, David Cameron went from saying he was "the strongest possible advocate for Turkey joining the EU" pre referendum to suddenly changing his tune and saying that they wouldn't join until 'the year 3000', however he repeatedly turned down the opportunity to say the UK would voto Turkey joining the EU.
2) The second is with regards to free movement negotiations with the EU, Cameron stated that he would seek to 'continue to negotiate free movement first thing on Fri', this was proven to be lies within hours by Junker who said: 'Mr Cameron got the maximum deal he could receive and we gave him the maximum deal we could give so there will be no kind of negotiation on the negotiation we found in February or as far as any treaty negotiation is concerned'.
3) David Cameron claimed repeatedly that EU migrants would have to leave the country if they did find work within six months. He said: 'If you vote to stay then we will get the changes that I have negotiated and that means that if somebody comes to Britain from the European Union, they can't claim unemployment benefits. If they haven't got a job after six months they have to leave'. This is obviously a lie as its in direct violation of the European Court of Justice which has ruled that Jobseekers cannot be removed irrespective of how long a person has been here providing they can prove to they are 'continuing to seek employment'. Not to mention the fact that Junker had already stated that no further negotiations would be possible (see above).
4) Finally David Cameron said us leaving could spark 'a trade war' this was dismissed by Markus Kerber the head of the BDI (which is the largest business organization in Germany) who said the following: 'Imposing trade barriers, imposing protectionist measures between our two countries or between two political centres, the EU on one hand and the UK on the other would be a very, very foolish thing to do in the 21st century. The BDI would urge poltitions on both sides to come up with a trade deal that enables us to uphold and maintain the current levels of trade we have'.
-
Inspired by a Daily Mail article on 22 June? Bit of an agenda there? Pinch of salt time?
1 - Turkey - I am note defending Cameron. He can twist like the weasel he is. But Turkey has to meet 25 criteria to apply to join the EU, and so far it meets just 1. Not going to happen soon. It was not true to suggest it would.
2 - Free movement - The UK is not alone in thinking free movement needs to be revisited. Juncker is not the EU. Nor is Merkel. The EU will continue to evolve. Norway pays more per head than we do for access to the EU, and has to accept free movement. Will we do better? Boris didn't think so.
3 - Migrants (and everone on these islands is descended from immigrants) - I am not defending Cameron. God knows where he got a six month figure from in the debate.
- Cameron had negotiated changes to benefit entitlements. Brexit has struck this down. It is one of the few reforms he actually managed to negotiate. [for a neutral view of what he had negotiated, see
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-35622105 - What he wanted and what he got]
4- Trade war. We will see. No free movement? Then WTO tariffs will apply. Whether that amounts to a trade war is a matter of semantics. The EU Trade Commissioner has said this week that the UK cannot even begin to negotiate a trade deal until after it has left, and she accepted this harms both sides. May be stupid, but it is their ball, and their game.