Current Affairs EU In or Out

In or Out

  • In

    Votes: 688 67.9%
  • Out

    Votes: 325 32.1%

  • Total voters
    1,013
Status
Not open for further replies.
I understand it. I just don't think the majority of voters and the public do. Just like the majority didn't understand what they were truly voting for in the slapped together referendum.

The point was if the MPs can't agree, then the whole thing should be laid out and presented to the public to take it away from them.

Basically the 3rd party adjudicator
I think its great how you can tell telepathically what millions of people want..
 
Downing Street is reportedly drawing up plans to give MPs a vote on seven alternative options to Theresa May's deal next week that could lead to a soft Brexit.

A senior minister has apparently leaked that MPs would get to choose between revoking Article 50, a second referendum, the Prime Minister's deal, her deal with a customs union, the deal with a customs union and single market, a standard free-trade agreement, or a no-deal Brexit.

It was also said MV3 will only be put forward if there is a realistic chance of winning, which almost certainly means it won't be brought forward at all now.

No chance then for Bercow to preen his feathers and proudly pontificate - while instructing us all in that annoyingly supercilious and condescending manner he so specialises in. Although tbf he didn't actually need MV3 to be brought forward last time, he just seized the moment anyway, as is his want, saying what he might or might not accept if it actually was brought forward - some time this session.

To echo @roydo oft made point there has just been a very decent discussion on this on radio 5 drive which is an excellent show .

As a leaver whose pretty much accepted that we’re leaving i’m delighted that we might have the opportunity to allow some changes to what’s on offer and walk us back from the cliff edge of a no deal and perhaps offer a significantly softer Brexit.
The discussion I referenced above although slanted by a may supporter did make the point however that there is no point to choosing a route out of the EU that the EU won’t sanction and waste another couple of years chasing another unachievable pipedream . If there is something realistic on offer then that could be something of benefit to many of us .
 
I agree in terms of how we move forward, and in my opinion, people persisting with the claim that 17.4m votes need to be respected is not the way out of this mess because they voted for an outcome, and not an outcome that had an easy path to follow.

The way out of this is to come up with credible options that Parliament can agree on, or go back to the people. Not to go back to the people with a re run of 2016 but with new options now we know what the situation is.
Looks like they are getting a few options to vote on next week , hopefully something comes out of it might have been an idea to do this 2 years ago
Not holding my breath to be honest but you never know
.
 
Downing Street is reportedly drawing up plans to give MPs a vote on seven alternative options to Theresa May's deal next week that could lead to a soft Brexit.

A senior minister has apparently leaked that MPs would get to choose between revoking Article 50, a second referendum, the Prime Minister's deal, her deal with a customs union, the deal with a customs union and single market, a standard free-trade agreement, or a no-deal Brexit.

It was also said MV3 will only be put forward if there is a realistic chance of winning, which almost certainly means it won't be brought forward at all now.

No chance then for Bercow to preen his feathers and proudly pontificate - while instructing us all in that annoyingly supercilious and condescending manner he so specialises in. Although tbf he didn't actually need MV3 to be brought forward last time, he just seized the moment anyway, as is his want, saying what he might or might not accept if it actually was brought forward - some time this session.
why don't they draw up a plan to leave on march 29th like the country ordered them to do.

because it doesn't suit anybody in power that's why
 
Well they have done their best to thwart it, and come up,with Jack crap refusing to meet her the great Jezza twice....

Whilst both the Labour and Tory top aren't up to the task. Labour is not the party responsible for the negotiations.

why don't they draw up a plan to leave on march 29th like the country ordered them to do.

because it doesn't suit anybody in power that's why

The Prime Minister (sort of a position of power) put forward a plan to leave on March 29th.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top