Pretty sure they just said they'd honour the result of the referendum.Both major parties put in their election manifestos to honour the referendum - which stated leaving the EU with out of the single market , and out of a customs union.......
Pretty sure they just said they'd honour the result of the referendum.Both major parties put in their election manifestos to honour the referendum - which stated leaving the EU with out of the single market , and out of a customs union.......
I think its great how you can tell telepathically what millions of people want..I understand it. I just don't think the majority of voters and the public do. Just like the majority didn't understand what they were truly voting for in the slapped together referendum.
The point was if the MPs can't agree, then the whole thing should be laid out and presented to the public to take it away from them.
Basically the 3rd party adjudicator
Should make it all of Yorkshire to be on the safe side.![]()
the easiest thing to do would to be impose Brexit on North Wales, the North East and parts of Yorkshire.
Downing Street is reportedly drawing up plans to give MPs a vote on seven alternative options to Theresa May's deal next week that could lead to a soft Brexit.
A senior minister has apparently leaked that MPs would get to choose between revoking Article 50, a second referendum, the Prime Minister's deal, her deal with a customs union, the deal with a customs union and single market, a standard free-trade agreement, or a no-deal Brexit.
It was also said MV3 will only be put forward if there is a realistic chance of winning, which almost certainly means it won't be brought forward at all now.
No chance then for Bercow to preen his feathers and proudly pontificate - while instructing us all in that annoyingly supercilious and condescending manner he so specialises in. Although tbf he didn't actually need MV3 to be brought forward last time, he just seized the moment anyway, as is his want, saying what he might or might not accept if it actually was brought forward - some time this session.
oh look its trolly mctrollface..
I think its great how you can tell telepathically what millions of people want..
Well they have done their best to thwart it, and come up,with Jack crap refusing to meet her the great Jezza twice....Pretty sure they just said they'd honour the result of the referendum.
Looks like they are getting a few options to vote on next week , hopefully something comes out of it might have been an idea to do this 2 years agoI agree in terms of how we move forward, and in my opinion, people persisting with the claim that 17.4m votes need to be respected is not the way out of this mess because they voted for an outcome, and not an outcome that had an easy path to follow.
The way out of this is to come up with credible options that Parliament can agree on, or go back to the people. Not to go back to the people with a re run of 2016 but with new options now we know what the situation is.
why don't they draw up a plan to leave on march 29th like the country ordered them to do.Downing Street is reportedly drawing up plans to give MPs a vote on seven alternative options to Theresa May's deal next week that could lead to a soft Brexit.
A senior minister has apparently leaked that MPs would get to choose between revoking Article 50, a second referendum, the Prime Minister's deal, her deal with a customs union, the deal with a customs union and single market, a standard free-trade agreement, or a no-deal Brexit.
It was also said MV3 will only be put forward if there is a realistic chance of winning, which almost certainly means it won't be brought forward at all now.
No chance then for Bercow to preen his feathers and proudly pontificate - while instructing us all in that annoyingly supercilious and condescending manner he so specialises in. Although tbf he didn't actually need MV3 to be brought forward last time, he just seized the moment anyway, as is his want, saying what he might or might not accept if it actually was brought forward - some time this session.
Well they have done their best to thwart it, and come up,with Jack crap refusing to meet her the great Jezza twice....
why don't they draw up a plan to leave on march 29th like the country ordered them to do.
because it doesn't suit anybody in power that's why
They've done their best to thwart May's deal, which you have said is terrible, yet at the same time vowing to honour the result of the referendum...you should be all in favour of Jezza.Well they have done their best to thwart it, and come up,with Jack crap refusing to meet her the great Jezza twice....
It also doesn't suit farmers, importers, exporters, financiers, tourists, engineers, doctors etc etc etcwhy don't they draw up a plan to leave on march 29th like the country ordered them to do.
because it doesn't suit anybody in power that's why
It also doesn't suit farmers, importers, exporters, financiers, tourists, engineers, doctors etc etc etc
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.