..I see Amber Rudd is now suggesting a cross-party approach to a soft Brexit solution. Two years late but better than never.
Current Affairs EU In or Out
- Thread starter micknick
- Start date
- Status
NilSatisOptimum
Player Valuation: £70m
Mr Brexit easy trade deal hinself Liam Fox, lauds EU Japan trade deal, well until March end 2019 that is...
I welcome the new trade deal between Japan and a group we're no longer a part of, it will form the basis of the new relationship between Japan and us in the future.
I must be missing something.
orchard
Player Valuation: £60m
It's not you, for a change, mate x
He's been impressively wrong on every single thing about Brexit he's piped up about.
You'd think by now he'd know to shut up, but seemingly not.
It's almost beyond parody now.
orchard
Player Valuation: £60m
I know. Can you imagine if this was Abbott, or Labour were in charge of this carnage?
We need a Labour government for a few years whilst the Conservatives purge their Spiv's and free-loaders.
I don't mean to be flippant, but how hard would it be for you to leave with no deal and join Australia, Canada, New Zealand, USA, Japan, India and China etc, who struggle by without EU membership?
True mate, at this moment in time I can't think of a worse government in my lifetime.
Looks like they will turn again now and have a second vote to get them off the hook.
It
Would take time to set the deals up, the first 4 have already said they will deal, China and India would be pretty hard to get going.
Yes, it would take time and there'd be short term pain, probably, but it seems a lot better than what's on offer right now.
http://theconversation.com/no-deal-...o-only-brexit-would-be-bad-for-britain-102009
Particularly point six of that list, but they're all basically correct.
It wouldn't be an issue if we had a transition deal of sorts for about twenty-five years, where we gradually disentangle ourselves from the EU. But the problem is that isn't possible because you can't make trade deals whilst part of the EU as they have their own collective deals that we are a part of, so it's a fundamental clash of interests.
All of those nations you list don't trade on WTO rules exclusively, which is what we'd have to do. They all have nuanced regional and international trade alliances that have taken decades to construct, mostly to avoid trading on WTO.
zzr45
#MURDERINGSCUM
APEC and NAFTA say hi.
Charlie Sweet
Player Valuation: £35m
Joey - what if say Boris was leader instead of May. He and his cabinet spent last 2 years getting best deal they could and the result was say staying in single market, paying maybe €10billion a year but limited freedom of movement. Would you accept that as the will if parliament? I'm trying to get at what part of our parliamentary democracy you don't like?
- Status