lol Loving your work this morning DarthNobody can tell me its a good idea to give anyone in the north east the right to vote
lol Loving your work this morning DarthNobody can tell me its a good idea to give anyone in the north east the right to vote
Didn't the Scottish know there was going to be an EU referendum when they voted to stay?
That is correct
18-25 year olds largely voted remain
All the old racists from backward towns like Burnley voted out
What has it done mate?im from Burnley and you have no idea what immigration has done to towns like it.
So was the stay campaign.
Indeed. France currently pay less than the Netherlands does and they are agitating for their own referendum.

The next PM is going to be a Brexit-er though, so even if the next few months show the argument for leaving to be nonsensical, it seems unlikely that they'll back down as they will lose credibility with those that voted them as leader from their own party, but also with the electorate at a looming general election. Politics will trump rationality.
Read this on Sky - sums things up well.
China has invested heavily, or at least planned to, using the UK as the bridgehead into Europe's 500 million-person market. Japan has been doing so for years - imagine Sunderland without the added Nissan.
Britain's flexible labour market, rule of law, financial services and tradition of entrepreneurism have, for 40 years, meant that it was able to attract non-EU investors keen to muscle in on the mainland's markets.
Britain has been seen by EU-outsiders as the broker between German and French competition inside Europe. Its standing in the world has been derived not only from its recent history of empire and Commonwealth connections but also because it has been a major player in the biggest trade bloc on earth.
What its place in that market will be in the long term will be the focus of anxious and prolonged negotiation.
But there can be no doubt that from Washington to Beijing leaders have been, and will be, shaking their heads with incredulity at what they will see as a bizarre turning inward by a nation that once saw no horizons to its influence.
That is pretty much it really - a bizarre, insular move from a country that is historically progressive and looks to influence the world.
I fear this mate, but British politics is now really a side show to over all impact. I think what hasnt been recognised by yesterdays vote, is despite the national fervour to "do it on our own". Britain is now more at risk to the political whims of Europe then ever before. Like it or not we live in a globalised world more so then ever before, no longer is the market for anything national s it was pre EU its global, for Britain to thrive and the British economy to compete it need to be so in haromny and recipricol retionships with Europe and the rest of the world. What Britain has bascially done yesterday is say - we dont need that, which is amazing. When Britain is ready to play football again, politcally Europe isnt going to say OK, you dont have to make contribution but can still have all the perks, Europe politcally needs to give Britain a kicking for its survival. In many ways Britain is going to be more exposed to European policy then ever before but not have a say on it.
In a globalised world Britain exisits with a broader social system, yesterday vote is basically just denial, the consequences i sincerley hope wont be as stark as i think they will be.
I disagree mate, i dont think the financial chip gives much if any leverage what so ever. Britain pay 18 bill to the EU, 5 Billion of that goes straight back to the UK in a rebate, while the EU gives the Uk 4.5 billion to the EU in grants mostly for farming and development of underprivilaged areas so your looking at a figure of £8.5 bill net the Uk contributes.
That cost can very simply be spread out amongst the member nations when you consider the scale and breath of all the member states. While because the EU has its own currency it can use its fiscal instruments to basically print money if required, obviously that has a different impact, but its whats it doing at the moment anyway.
I think the only hope Britian has is lobbying closely linked states or its main trade parteners in the Eu to have a groundswell of inside states who would back Britain for trade purposes. However i do think the cost of letting Britain leave without a kicking is unlikely, given that it would as was pointed out may incentivise other nations to leave the EU nation. If Britain gets any perks then why wouldnt other nations if they left, thats not going to happen politically. No way is this going to be an easy exit for Britain.
My own opinion, is that i do hope an easy exit happens for the British citizens sake but also th eimpact it will have the economies of Britains trade partners, at the very least try to keep in the free market, but i just dont see it happening.
I'm not sure if you're being facetious or what mate, but just about everything under the sun.
The overloading of services, costs to the country e.t.c..
I'm not saying it was one way traffic mate.Strangely, I see our own low-paid (& claiming benefits) and the unemployed (Through no fault of their own) getting as much blame for the exact same reasons, too.
It's far from all being one-way traffic.
One things for certain - Ireland is going to suffer badly from this. The UK is Ireland's biggest trading partner. The Irish Times has a good overview of the problems facing Ireland post-Brexit
http://www.irishtimes.com/news/irel...s-brexit-nightmare-mean-for-ireland-1.2697702
Strangely, I see our own low-paid (& claiming benefits) and the unemployed (Through no fault of their own) getting as much blame for the exact same reasons, too.
It's far from all being one-way traffic.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.