As long as I don't have to pay him.we must be paying him an absolute fortune in wages if he is going to be on a par with what he is getting at City.
Supposedly he's on £65k a week at City mate.
Wowzerz. Thats even worse. Thats almost VVD money in todays money.On 11 August 2014, Mangala signed for English club Manchester City on a five-year contract,[22] for a reported £31.8 million transfer fee.[23][24] It was however reported 18 months into his contract that the fee was more in the region of £42m due to spiralling costs as a result of Mangala's split ownership at Porto, with City having to pay in the region of £18m to two companies which owned over 40% of Mangala's economic rights.
I think it more likely City will offer an attacking player to replace an attacking player.Been offered to Leicester as part of the mahrez deal apparently
Been offered to Leicester as part of the mahrez deal apparently
Its an understatement to say he's not that good, even on loan. There is a possibility he may form part of the Mahrez deal so don't fret too much yet. We need cover in the middle, a relatively cheap option, vastly superior to Mangala, is Flint at Bristol City, unlike Mangala he scores goals, can jump, he'd throw himself in front of a train to block it and he reads a back line far better than this Citeh reject. They want £10 MIL, pocket money in today's market
hmmmmmmmmHis name means "The Gypsy" in Bulgarian, so for that reason alone - cancel this transfer immediately.
Plus he's very meh.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.