Current Affairs Donald Trump POS: Judgement cometh and that right soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's a bit worrying that you make such strong assertions that are wrong. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/147/free-movement-of-persons is quite clear - people are free to move throughout the EU however they want. There is no guarantee that they will be eligible for any kind of social security support during that time, but if you have the means to support yourself, then there are no barriers to movement whatsoever.

The key bit being “if you have the means to support yourself”; if you don’t then a member state can kick you out after three months and it takes you five years to gain residency.

Your fundamental argument seems to be that people should be treated differently by virtue of their nationality. It's not an argument I understand at all.

While we have nations, of course people should be treated differently based on whether or not they are a member of the nation in which they live.

I mean, that is how every nation and the EU operates (internally and externally) so I don’t understand why you don’t understand it.
 
The key bit being “if you have the means to support yourself”; if you don’t then a member state can kick you out after three months and it takes you five years to gain residency.



While we have nations, of course people should be treated differently based on whether or not they are a member of the nation in which they live.

I mean, that is how every nation and the EU operates (internally and externally) so I don’t understand why you don’t understand it.

I don't think many would equate freedom as being freedom to draw from a social insurance system you haven't contributed to. As it is, the EU are a positive beacon in at least giving people the freedom to move wherever they want providing they can support themselves. As you say, most countries don't come close to this, and continue painting anyone foreign as a bogeyman.
 
I can't unsee it so the rest of you have to suffer with me

48356585_515460555602006_1750441220296933376_n.jpg
 
https://www.propublica.org/article/...paid-trumps-company-with-ivanka-in-the-middle
When it came out this year that President Donald Trump’s inaugural committee raised and spent unprecedented amounts, people wondered where all that money went. It turns out one beneficiary was Trump himself.

The inauguration paid the Trump Organization for rooms, meals and event space at the company’s Washington hotel, according to interviews as well as internal emails and receipts reviewed by WNYC and ProPublica.

During the planning, Ivanka Trump, the president-elect’s eldest daughter and a senior executive with the Trump Organization, was involved in negotiating the price the hotel charged the 58th Presidential Inaugural Committee for venue rentals. A top inaugural planner emailed Ivanka and others at the company to “express my concern” that the hotel was overcharging for its event spaces, worrying of what would happen “when this is audited.”

If the Trump hotel charged more than the going rate for the venues, it could violate tax law. The inaugural committee’s payments to the Trump Organization and Ivanka Trump’s role have not been previously reported or disclosed in public filings.

“The fact that the inaugural committee did business with the Trump Organization raises huge ethical questions about the potential for undue enrichment,” said Marcus Owens, the former head of the division of the Internal Revenue Service that oversees nonprofits.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top