Council pushing for EFC & LFC as enablers to Open Outer Loop Line

Status
Not open for further replies.
But they are not in the Premier

And??

Look at a rail map - 27 rapid-transit rail platform around the stadium.

Yeah, funnily enough, living in London I have occasionally perused over a rail map - actually for the Emirates an Underground map is more useful - but i'm talking about the actual experience of actually going to the game and actually using the 'rapid-transit' transport system, something you clearly actually have no experience of yourself.
 

You don't know?

Yeah, funnily enough, living in London I have occasionally perused over a rail map - actually for the Emirates an Underground map is more useful - but i'm talking about the actual experience of actually going to the game and actually using the 'rapid-transit' transport system, something you clearly actually have no experience of yourself.

I have lived in the metropolis and know the Underground very well. I can also count, and there are 27 rapid-transit rail platforms around the Emirates. Spurs can count as well and were willing to build two stadia to get what Arsenal have.

The Council see this and are banging heads together to get things moving. See post No. 1
 
Last edited:
It's all pie in the sky with this board in charge mate.

Respected posters like me and Black Toffee don't trust the board to have the vision or drive to deliver on any new stadium project.
 
It's all pie in the sky with this board in charge mate.

Respected posters like me and Black Toffee don't trust the board to have the vision or drive to deliver on any new stadium project.

The council are doing the base work to make it work for both clubs. The clubs do not have to think. The Council aim to:
  1. Put them both on a rapid-transit network - guarantees success
  2. Find sites for them on the Outer Loop - of which there are many suitable candidates.
All a thick board has to do is fall in line. That means get a stadium design and finance to build it, as the Council do the prime work for them. They lead them to success.

Leave it to any one of the clubs and nothing will happen as they will not work together, it needs a driver to get it all together.

Please do not respond with they are skint, bla, bla, bla. Finance would be available for such schemes with high stadia returns.

The debacle of Kirkby has focused the minds of the need for rapid-transit rail compounded by the massive success of Arsenal.

All I am doing is relaying what the Council aim to do with both clubs. The Council are taking the lead and attempting to get the stadium issues for both clubs sorted once and for all, and benefitting the city in general creating economic growth as a bonus with an expanded metro network which we will all use.

The stadia is like an open wound for the past 14 years. After EFCs proposed plans in May 1997, with a colour double spread in the Echo, there has been constant half-proposals by both clubs, and even one which has cleared a site, but still not a brick has been laid for any stadium for any club. It is like stuck record.

Two clubs build large stadia at the same time in the city? A unique occurrence. The Council have to take the lead and get both clubs in good locations and get the rapid-transit transport for both sorted. This benefits all and promotes the city, which is what the Council are supposed to do. The Council should have done this when LFC started to talk about moving home. Instead the LibDems whittered on about a shared stadium and just dealt with each club individually.

Using the same transport infrastructure for both is the way - even though the clubs may be located miles apart.
 
Last edited:
You don't know?

Im not sure you do...

I have lived in the metropolis and know the Underground very well. I can also count, and there are 27 rapid-transit rail platforms around the Emirates. Spurs can count as well and were willing to build two stadia to get what Arsenal have.

The Council see this and are banging heads together to get things moving. See post No. 1

Are you just gonna repeat the same line over and over again, and keep referring everyone to your first post?
 
It would be a good thing to read and UNDERSTAND the first post. The thread then adds more. Then post.

You need to put some spin on it mate. My eyes glazed over half way down. You could try introducing an evil character an arch villain to make it more interesting. Everyone does on this forum. So we aint getting rapid transit with 27 platforms.*

*Blame it on Kenwright.
 
It would be a good thing to read and UNDERSTAND the first post. The thread then adds more. Then post.

I have. It would be a good idea not to keep repeating the same thing over and over again and advance the discussion instead of recycling it you arrogant tw@t.

I have to agree with Philw and I vote to close this thread. We can't all be dunces. Inner City, I've read the first post. You quote an unattributable question (your blue lined text for those who've not read the first post) as if its Council policy. You then don't offer any other source to demonstrate that this is indeed council policy. If you can't prove that this is Council policy (which you clearly can't), then the rest of the discussion is about your own train building obsession.

Which is nice, but this is an Everton forum, not train watching monthly.

Close the thread please. The thread author has a one track mind.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar Threads

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top