It's not for your own good. It's for the good of all, literally the entire world.
Cherry picking potential out of context quotes not withstanding...I do it my self...and as somebody who has been triple vaxxed and vaxxed with everything from Polio, smallpox, that many times due to work in hospitals and overseas, I can't remember them all - I agree with you, but the closet Liberterian in me doesn't like the general...nanny knows best...type government.
One '
Wrong' as seen from my, or an anti vaxxers point of view + one '
Wrong' from the government's
'The greater good of all' (Control via medical apartheid?) point of view might = some sort of expedient
'right'
I still tend to cancel both sides of the above equation down to its core.
2 'wrongs' don't make a 'right'.
I understand that usually governments know when to stop going too far down these sort of roads.
But which comes first?
Which leads to which?
The Greater Good, The road to hell being paved with good intentions or The Slippery Slope.
if the 5% want to act silly it doesn't bother me.
Governments must try not to over govern
I've done all I can to protect me (and so have the vast majority of others.) I've stacked the odds as best I can in my favour, so I'll let the bet ride.
3 things might happen to them (the so called 5%)
1) Nothing
2) They get sick and recover...(so could I despite all)
3) They get sick and die...sad for the individuals family, no man is an Island etc.
There is an alternative - Faites vos jeux.
They chose to not use it - Rein na vs plus.
Bit of a rant/ramble there, soz
