Kev The Rat
Player Valuation: £70m
That’s not what I meantdamn, I was hoping to go skiing and listen to ABBA. Crying and shaking here tbh.
Although on your point you’d think we’d at least reciprocate their ‘goodwill’ to us
That’s not what I meantdamn, I was hoping to go skiing and listen to ABBA. Crying and shaking here tbh.
You have to isolate for at least 2 days coming in from any country though, which is the sensible solutionThat’s not what I meant
Although on your point you’d think we’d at least reciprocate their ‘goodwill’ to us
That’s not what I meant
Although on your point you’d think we’d at least reciprocate their ‘goodwill’ to us
Thing is though there’s no tracking of these people when they come in. They can travel to any part of the country they want after landing, prior to isolating - isn’t that ridiculous ?You have to isolate for at least 2 days coming in from any country though, which is the sensible solution
Probably, the whole thing is ridiculous. But then cooping people up in hotels like it's a prison isn't a good idea in my book anyway.Thing is though there’s no tracking of these people when they come in. They can travel to any part of the country they want after landing, prior to isolating - isn’t that ridiculous ?
Both things can be true thoughChristina Pagel the lockdown lover has already started to say the models are wrong purely because of people changing their behaviours. The worst case scenario models were a million miles out.
yeah unfortunately the way it was publicised by the press causes panicBoth things can be true though
a) that the reduction in socializing and uptake in boosters have made in difference - both been pretty significant at least anecdotally.
b) the worse case scenario models aren’t matching present reality.
Those worse case scenarios will have been built on things like vaccine from severe disease being substantially eroded or the boosters not being effective against Omicron.
Given the quite dramatic differences in Omicron’s genetic makeup I don’t think it an error that these possibilities were included in modeling as one possibility in a range of scenarios.
Both things can be true though
a) that the reduction in socializing and uptake in boosters have made in difference - both been pretty significant at least anecdotally.
b) the worse case scenario models aren’t matching present reality.
Those worse case scenarios will have been built on things like vaccine from severe disease being substantially eroded or the boosters not being effective against Omicron.
Given the quite dramatic differences in Omicron’s genetic makeup I don’t think it an error that these possibilities were included in modeling as one possibility in a range of scenarios.
It's definitely an error. Having an almost impossible scenario is not acceptable at this stage, the models should tighten and improve as the pandemic progresses. I'm a moron but even I knew the vaccine would be relatively effective, doing models with zero effectiveness when SA shows the complete opposite is ridiculous.
Pagel is an absolute disgrace who is out to make some money and a TV career. She shouldn't be on TV.
Sorry that meant to say “the boosters not being as effective against Omicron“, I haven’t looked at the particular UK models but doubt they included anything as unlikely as zero effectiveness.It's definitely an error. Having an almost impossible scenario is not acceptable at this stage, the models should tighten and improve as the pandemic progresses. I'm a moron but even I knew the vaccine would be relatively effective, doing models with zero effectiveness when SA shows the complete opposite is ridiculous.
Pagel is an absolute disgrace who is out to make some money and a TV career. She shouldn't be on TV.
@Neiler
![]()
A computational biologist weighs in on Omicron, the future of vaccines, and the CDC’s variant forecast
A computational biologist thinks potentially half the globe may contract Omicron over the coming weeks and months.www.statnews.com
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.