To the best of my knowledge, yes.Is that all ages ?
I suspect their view is that if a young child is isolating then an adult will be there to look after them (well you'd hope so), so they'd be able to support them.For secondary pupils online could work. But for primary schools pupils who supervisors this and sits with the kids to help them if parents are working? Genuinely interested in any opinions around this?
To the best of my knowledge, yes.
I suspect their view is that if a young child is isolating then an adult will be there to look after them (well you'd hope so), so they'd be able to support them.
Yet, it relies on the adult either having the time to support (not working from home) or the ability to do so; it also heavily relies on children having the technology.
It will unevenly support those who are not from poor or deprived areas and that's before considering language barriers, before even considering age limitations.
I feel that it's important that they should offer high quality education, which my wife's schools do whereas others didn't, but implementation is a nightmare.
She was even saying that they're expected to provide monitor usage and provide feedback, but how can you ensure parents comply?
That's the big question.
I think most of us are prepared to lockdown again to help get through the winter. I can't see being this way next year.
Oh I agree.Isolating and total lockdown are separate things though. Home education is not possible for primary school children unless there is an adult present full time to support it
Oh I agree.
However, the point is that the government and DfE have apparently thrown the onus onto the schools to ensure that firstly it's available, and to some extent used.
Legally, a primary school child shouldn't be at home alone so in that sense they're not separate: if they're home they should be learning will be their argument.
The government response to the whole thing has been an absolute disgrace, its that bad you could get random people off the street who would probably be more effective.
The government has cut down on the number of devices it has giving to schools by a substantial amount.
Well yeah, but that's because most people on the streets aren't morally bankrupt gobshites who only want to please their pay masters.
Measures should be taken to protect those most vulnerable without impacting too negatively on the vast majority of people’s lives. The reckoning from this for the younger generations will be seismic. Forcing healthy people out of work and locked down into their own homes is an absolutely massive failure of policy.
So preservation of life should or shouldn't be based on age? What if this virus was killing 0-5 year old children, would the view be the same?Measures should be taken to protect those most vulnerable without impacting too negatively on the vast majority of people’s lives. The reckoning from this for the younger generations will be seismic. Forcing healthy people out of work and locked down into their own homes is an absolutely massive failure of policy.
For secondary pupils online could work. But for primary schools pupils who supervisors this and sits with the kids to help them if parents are working? Genuinely interested in any opinions around this?
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.