Imagine trying to talk about a serious world crisis by promotiong your own idiotic "jet fuel can't melt steel beams" logic into the diaglogue. Absolutely nothing self-centered about that. Maybe we can get Baz back and have him do a powerpoint on parallels between climate change-hoax and Covid.
You misunderstood. My point was that 911 is a great example that government experts are often blindly believed by the public simply on account of the fact that they
are experts.
Even in the face of scientific impossibilities such as 2 planes bringing down three buildings(3-2=1)
I am the loony with the fantastical beliefs!
The point I was (which you somehow believe is me being self centered?) making earlier, was that the UK government will not publish their computer modelling that is the basis of their own action/inaction, in their attempts to contain (now delay) covid 19. This is the dastardly policy of herd immunity, or basically to let as many people as possible to get infected and therefore die.
We are not allowed to see the computer modelling, and they will not publish the research that this policy is, or was based upon. Even if this scientific logic is considered to be dangerously flawed, and reckless, according to all other European countries, and the World Health Organization itself. We are simply supposed to take their word for it because again... they are the experts.
How is this connected to 911?
Well (and this really was explained in the OP)...
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), also did their own computer modelling, which they claim explains, how the three trade center buildings were brought down by fire, in direct violation of a number of scientific, and physical laws such as conservation of momentum, and even gravity itself.
You see a steel framed high rise, had never fallen due to fire before. But on 911, three fell down, all on the same day, and all due to fire.
So, naturally NIST was under immense pressure to explain how this scientific impossibility, was scientifically possible, and how it occurred. Their explanation finally was something called 'thermal expansion' a completely new phenomenon that had never before or since, brought down a steel framed high rise (much less 3) especially not at, or close to the speed of gravity.
The crucial point is, that again, NIST refused to publish this information, and release it, to the public, or for peer review, because they claimed they were worried that the information would fall into the hands of terrorists.
Or was it, because Issac Newton was right all along? Well just publish the data right?
But don't take my word for it, here is a former employee of NIST itself speaking out, and saying the same thing. Another nut, and loony conspiracy theorist.
The thing is mate, I am not trying to convince you, or people like you. I can see from your attitude that it would be a waste of time. I doubt you even made it to the end of this post...
But... hopefully maybe some will be more willing to keep an open mind, and do their own research.
Take care.