zzr45
#MURDERINGSCUM
Superman. He’d fix it.From a scientific perspective, who do you think should be there that isn't?
Superman. He’d fix it.From a scientific perspective, who do you think should be there that isn't?
Rumours bubbling of a further 3 week lockdown - kinell open the barbers Boris atleast![]()
Have you seen his Barnet?Rumours bubbling of a further 3 week lockdown - kinell open the barbers Boris atleast![]()
They may be able to track every person in the country, but it doesn't automatically follow that they would be able to use that ability to effectively contact trace. This app gives them that capability.
From a scientific perspective, who do you think should be there that isn't?
Yes. They counted any test that have left the centre.Has the government done this? Bit daft if so as it automatically calls into question their integrity. How did they get over the issue of test results? because surely if they say somebody has tested they have to say whether it was negative or positive.
No doubt Hancock would have had himself tested 50,000 times in one day had he not found another way to 'cook the books'.
Hmm. Waste of money or worth prepping for?
We're not. But there is need for oversight and others can provide it. Isn't that the reason we have watchdog organisations?I would hope that those such as are on SAGE will be having robust discussions, as they're in possession of the information, and the background, to know what's what. Titheads like Piers Morgan have neither of those things, and nor do any of us on here. I'm just not sure what gives us the belief that we're in any position to critique what these committees recommend?
Have you seen his Barnet?
I'm sure that most of us have similar opinions with respect to Morgan. However, the difference back then was that there were very few tests available.Piers Morgan helping him out as well. Remember when everyone complained that our future King was tested, but nothing when Piers Morgan, who doesn’t even have symptoms apparently, does.....
We're not. But there is need for oversight and others can provide it. Isn't that the reason we have watchdog organisations?
Massive u-turns have been made on strategy, under sourcing of vital equipment has been made, confusing methodology employed in counting cases / deaths. It's not as if there isn't a need to oversee SAGE is it?
In any case, scrutiny is part of the process toward doing things better...which is what we want, isn't it?
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.