S
Compare it with its neighbours, Sweden have made a mistake not locking down.
Compare it with Spain, France, UK and Italy, they've done alright and not crashed their economy entirely.
There's no real winners in this anyway, but depending what point you're wanting to argue you can just put it either way.
Yes, lets
From the worldometers site, the same data source that the Spiked article used (although oddly despite the article being dated today they used the 17th April figures.
As of 22 nd April
Sweden![]()
Coronavirus Update (Live): 130,307,410 Cases and 2,842,464 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer
Live statistics and coronavirus news tracking the number of confirmed cases, recovered patients, tests, and death toll due to the COVID-19 coronavirus from Wuhan, China. Coronavirus counter with new cases, deaths, and number of tests per 1 Million population. Historical data and info. Daily...www.worldometers.info
cases 16,004, cases per 1M pop 1585, total deaths 1937, deaths per 1m pop 192, tests 94,500, tests per 1m 9357
Norway
cases 7275, cases per 1M pop 1342, total deaths 185, deaths per 1m pop 34, tests 148,656, tests per 1m 27,421
Denmark
cases 7,912, cases per 1M pop 1366, total deaths 384 deaths per 1m pop 66, tests 108,465, tests per 1m 18,726
Finland
cases 4,129 cases per 1M pop 745, total deaths 149 deaths per 1m pop 27, tests 68,552, tests per 1m 12,372
And this was their “analysis”
See the distortion in the data the writer makes?
1) He uses data from last Friday which significantly reduces Sweden’s case/death numbers
2) Provides no context that the neighboring countries are doing far more testing so will likely have higher case numbers
3) Does not provide their deaths per 1m which are vastly better than Sweden, only compared it to Europe as a whole
4) Provides no context of when first case was recorded which is important in determining how long a country has had an outbreak - Norway’s numbers are probably flattered in this respect as they registered their first case about a month later than Sweden iirc but Finland’s was about the same so is still a useful comparison.
If you are making an honest assessment of data you include ALL of it and make your best conclusion based on it, not just cherry pick it to suit your argument. Although the Sweden example wasn’t as flagrant as him just writing off all of New York‘s 20,000 deaths as an “outlier” and therefore not worthy of inclusion In his “calculations”!
Compare it with its neighbours, Sweden have made a mistake not locking down.
Compare it with Spain, France, UK and Italy, they've done alright and not crashed their economy entirely.
There's no real winners in this anyway, but depending what point you're wanting to argue you can just put it either way.