Degs62
Player Valuation 10"
Brother if you haven't got a hole in your arse what the fook are you crapping out of![]()
Misread your post LOL, just lightening the mood.
Brother if you haven't got a hole in your arse what the fook are you crapping out of![]()
In the past ten years the net spend of the following clubs:
Newcastle: £30m
Everton: £18m
Aston Villa: £105m (FFS)
Fulham: £17m
West Brom: £32m
We've actually been outspent by two clubs who have spent time in the Championship in the past ten years, it's madness. Fulham have spent £1m less but we've been far stronger in the premier league. Villa are just a disgrace.
Villa sold Young, Downing.. For top dollar didn't they ?
Martin O'Neil must have spunked some big money..
"No one is bigger than the club" - This line that keeps getting chucked out on this thread, do you apply the same standards to the owners of the club after 13 years. I mean has Bill becoming the "the greatest living evertonian" elevated him to beyond the same standard that is applied to Moyes.?
Why is no one applying the same rule to the owners who have done nothing for the last 13 years except hope they can cash in whilst enjoying the share value rise of the back of Moyes in the last 11 years.
I can see it now, after Moyes goes the fans will be like " eh lar no one is bigger than this club, is right...anyway Martinez has said that we should build slowly for the future so we might get mid table next year....dam obstructed seats today"
CLAP CLAP CLAP
No you idiot how many times do I have to say it, he's had 10 yrs of pressure free existence which has produced 3 players who've gone on with (lets be generous) felli, Baines who'd make a turn and go on as well. The rest stayed here if they were better than here do you think they'd of stayed.
Fellaini ? Billy ? Yak ?
Surely this is classed as big money ?
Really??
WTF!
CLAP CLAP CLAP
No not really. We are fighting for fourth in the richest league on the planet and our record signing doesn't register in the top 200 transfer fees. Show me a team of our quality or more that hasn't got players that cost much more.
15 mil is big for us but in terms of the big players its nothing like spending big money. Even more so when the funds are created through player sales
His point is that he's still had 25million etc at points to spend whether through player sales or not, it's still a budget to work off when it appeared.
The "net spend" argument to me is kopiteish in terms of using it to an advantage to either cover up failures of your team, or boost "the punching above your weight" honour.
Fundamentally, Moyes has for the most part bought well, while others around him haven't. But to say Moyes has had zip and is a pauper in the bad world of football solely based on "net spend" is a bit lop sided imo.
I look at the whole picture. The problem has always been the sell to buy policy when we've needed the cash to push on and it's not been there.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.