CONFIRMED: Moyes Leaving - All Reaction Here

Status
Not open for further replies.
In the past ten years the net spend of the following clubs:

Newcastle: £30m
Everton: £18m
Aston Villa: £105m (FFS)
Fulham: £17m
West Brom: £32m

We've actually been outspent by two clubs who have spent time in the Championship in the past ten years, it's madness. Fulham have spent £1m less but we've been far stronger in the premier league. Villa are just a disgrace.

Villa sold Young, Downing.. For top dollar didn't they ?
Martin O'Neil must have spunked some big money..
 
Just read through most of this. Alot of people share the feeling of fear should Moyes leave and like myself expect the possibility of a decline again. But I will still question WHY have we put up with the lack of investment for over a generation and surely if Moyes calls time that would be the perfect time to oust the board? The fans got rid of Johnston. Liverpool fans agressively got rid of Hicks and Gillette who had no intentions of selling. There are people interested in buying football clubs and I am sure someone out there would turn us around. Instead of looking at the negatives look at the positives. We have huge potential still. Who would have pictured where Man City are at the turn of the century. NSNO -- I want that to ring true again in my lifetime.
 
"No one is bigger than the club" - This line that keeps getting chucked out on this thread, do you apply the same standards to the owners of the club after 13 years. I mean has Bill becoming the "the greatest living evertonian" elevated him to beyond the same standard that is applied to Moyes.?

Why is no one applying the same rule to the owners who have done nothing for the last 13 years except hope they can cash in whilst enjoying the share value rise of the back of Moyes in the last 11 years.

I can see it now, after Moyes goes the fans will be like " eh lar no one is bigger than this club, is right...anyway Martinez has said that we should build slowly for the future so we might get mid table next year....dam obstructed seats today"

CLAP CLAP CLAP
 
Also why does everyone write Moyes' job off as 'safe' ? It's only safe because he's delivered above average results consistently. If we were finishing 13th or lower and in relegation scraps for a few years in a row he'd be on his way in a hurry.
 
"No one is bigger than the club" - This line that keeps getting chucked out on this thread, do you apply the same standards to the owners of the club after 13 years. I mean has Bill becoming the "the greatest living evertonian" elevated him to beyond the same standard that is applied to Moyes.?

Why is no one applying the same rule to the owners who have done nothing for the last 13 years except hope they can cash in whilst enjoying the share value rise of the back of Moyes in the last 11 years.

I can see it now, after Moyes goes the fans will be like " eh lar no one is bigger than this club, is right...anyway Martinez has said that we should build slowly for the future so we might get mid table next year....dam obstructed seats today"

CLAP CLAP CLAP

Really??

WTF!

CLAP CLAP CLAP
 
No you idiot how many times do I have to say it, he's had 10 yrs of pressure free existence which has produced 3 players who've gone on with (lets be generous) felli, Baines who'd make a turn and go on as well. The rest stayed here if they were better than here do you think they'd of stayed.

What utter ****e that is.

Your entire argument has no basis, as you're incapable of looking at anything Moyes based objectively, due to your hatred of the man, as you see him as 'propping up' Kenwright, when in fact he's just doing his ****ing job. But anyway, your angle of attack this time is way wide of the mark.

Moyes has spent £114M in total of which only £11M is net spend, you could argue that Rooney was a 'gift', as he was home grown, so add his £27M to the net spend & you get a total of £38M - against a total spend of £114M - where's the balance come from? & when you've worked that out, then calculate the value of the current squad & compare it to the value of the one he took over a decade back. Add those 2 figures together & you'll see what value Moyes has generated simply by player trading.

If you can look at that number & say it's 'average' then you're not worth wasting a post on & should be put in the WUM category.
 
Fellaini ? Billy ? Yak ?
Surely this is classed as big money ?

No not really. We are fighting for fourth in the richest league on the planet and our record signing doesn't register in the top 200 transfer fees. Show me a team of our quality or more that hasn't got players that cost much more.
15 mil is big for us but in terms of the big players its nothing like spending big money. Even more so when the funds are created through player sales
 
No not really. We are fighting for fourth in the richest league on the planet and our record signing doesn't register in the top 200 transfer fees. Show me a team of our quality or more that hasn't got players that cost much more.
15 mil is big for us but in terms of the big players its nothing like spending big money. Even more so when the funds are created through player sales

His point is that he's still had 25million etc at points to spend whether through player sales or not, it's still a budget to work off when it appeared.

The "net spend" argument to me is kopiteish in terms of using it to an advantage to either cover up failures of your team, or boost "the punching above your weight" honour.

Fundamentally, Moyes has for the most part bought well, while others around him haven't. But to say Moyes has had zip and is a pauper in the bad world of football solely based on "net spend" is a bit lop sided imo. It's the "We never lose with Phil Neville in the side" type of argument to prove a point.

I look at the whole picture. The problem has always been the sell to buy policy when we've needed the cash to push on and it's not been there.
 
Last edited:
Some serious cases of cognitive dissonance in here.

A poster is saying Moyes is "average" in the transfer market yet the squads he has put together, who have accumulated the 5th most points over his time in charge, have underachieved.

He must be a hell of a tactician in that case. Yet we are also informed we always lose to poor teams and never beat rich teams.

I really can't understand how when the facts are SO obviously against the Moyes-outers they can still make the same tired arguments every season.
 
His point is that he's still had 25million etc at points to spend whether through player sales or not, it's still a budget to work off when it appeared.

Clearly I'm missing something. Are you telling me there is no difference between having Rooney in our squad AND £25m to spend and having Rooney in our squad OR £25m to spend?

The "net spend" argument to me is kopiteish in terms of using it to an advantage to either cover up failures of your team, or boost "the punching above your weight" honour.

Ah Kopiteish, see we've reached the GOT Godwin Law already.

If I give you £1m and take it back instantly and give you friend £1m and don't expect it back are you as rich as your friend?

Fundamentally, Moyes has for the most part bought well, while others around him haven't. But to say Moyes has had zip and is a pauper in the bad world of football solely based on "net spend" is a bit lop sided imo.

OK we'll look at just gross spend.
http://www.transferleague.co.uk/league-tables/transfer-league-table-2003-to-date.html
Yep still down in about 12th place.

I look at the whole picture. The problem has always been the sell to buy policy when we've needed the cash to push on and it's not been there.

Err that is why we have a low net spend. Sell to buy = Low net spend.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar Threads

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top