Why did Man U choice Moyes over Mourinho? Mourinho is a far better manager for sure. His record speaks for itself. His days of flitting between clubs is over, he wants stability. He wants to be a in a country that loves him, the Latin countries do not.
The Glazers have been ripping Man U off for a time now. The profits go to fund other US ventures or plainly creamed off by the family. Moyes average finish is 7.6, so round up to 8th. Once he flirted with relegation. No trophies won. But he has an image of being an overachiever.
Everton has the 8th highest wages bill in the Prem and regularly finish 8th on average - Moyes does not overachieve on that point. His "net" average spending on transfers for last 5 years is £800,000. That is remarkable. Everton are going for their fifth top-eight finish in a row. The net transfer spend over that 5 year period would put them fourth from bottom.
Everton are one of six clubs, along with Swansea, Wigan, Newcastle, Reading and Arsenal, to record a profit in the past 5 years. In Everton's case £12.3m. Everton's average net spend per season in the Moyes years comes in at a small £803,000, to Aston Villa's average of £10.8m over the past decade, Stoke's £7.8m and Sunderland £7.6m. Everton were pushing for a Champions League place until recently; Villa, Stoke and Sunderland fighting relegation. Liverpool have spent an average £17.7m
That is what attracted the greedy Glazers. He does not spend a lot and can keep a team competing at the top. Silverware means little to the suits it is only the bottom line that counts - as Arsenal directors have gleefully found with Wenger and 7 years of each game being 60,000. When the lolly rolls in who cares about a silver cup. Only the fans do.