CONFIRMED: Moyes Leaving - All Reaction Here
- Thread starter GrandOldTeam
- Start date
-
- Tags
- david moyes
- Status
Rumor Alert from TPF
The Manager requested that the contracts of several players were sorted out this season to ensure none were left too short
Hence Jags, Ossie etc singing new deals
Mr Baines was one of the players who Mr Moyes wanted signed up to a new deal as priority
As of yet the Everton Hierarchy have failed to deliver this.
Come summer Mr Baines will only have 2 years left, and Mr Moyes is not happy ss this means Mr Baines could end up leaving far cheaper than desired
Mr Moyes has not aimed his displeasure at Mr Baines, but more so at those responsible for sorting the contracts as they have failed to be as proactive as he would like
The Manager requested that the contracts of several players were sorted out this season to ensure none were left too short
Hence Jags, Ossie etc singing new deals
Mr Baines was one of the players who Mr Moyes wanted signed up to a new deal as priority
As of yet the Everton Hierarchy have failed to deliver this.
Come summer Mr Baines will only have 2 years left, and Mr Moyes is not happy ss this means Mr Baines could end up leaving far cheaper than desired
Mr Moyes has not aimed his displeasure at Mr Baines, but more so at those responsible for sorting the contracts as they have failed to be as proactive as he would like
Ihaters
Player Valuation: £35m
oooh I know.. I know.. but I'll let Brennan
What are you even talking about :/
toffeejack
Player Valuation: £100m
To be fair, i said that at the end of last season ha
so wenger has won 3 league titles (one achieved doing something that may never be matched again), 4 FA Cups, reached a champions league final, reached europe's elite competition in god knows how many consecutive years. even last week he managed to get his fairly average arsenal team to win 2-0 away at one of the best teams in the world.
but because he bought gervinho and arshavin, he's a bad manager?
what about his signings of fabregas, nasri, henry and the ilk?
Arsenal have spent 952 million on their first team between 2002 and 2012. Tottenham have spent 661 million during that time.
Arsenal have a net profit of 23 million in the transfer window during that time period while Spurs have a net spend of 100 million but that doesn't change the fact that arsenal have invested more money than spurs. It's their choice to spend it on wages and not fees but they still spent it, in fact they spent more.
Net spend doesn't tell you much at all about the real picture.
LOL, yeah, £80m for one player, to a different league. Well done to them for continuing to win stuff under such crippling conditions.
toffeejack
Player Valuation: £100m
oh no, phill neville's been given the england u21's coaching job for the EC, god help us all
Well the bigger picture shows me that Spurs are now finishing higher than Arsenal.
So maybe Net spend means more than Wages?
neil999
Player Valuation: £80m
how do you/we know phil neville would be a bad manager?
It clearly does though.
Arsenal's wage bill has remained consistently high since they came to the Emirates, it is their net spend which has dropped. And guess what ? No trophies for 8 years.
The wage bill at Everton has increased regularly since Moyes took over, but his net spend has remained low and guess what ? Can't push into the top 5 money bags clubs.
Wigan have barely spent any money in about four years, and guess what ? Relegation candidates constantly.
Nobody is saying net spend is the be all and end all for understanding the financial situation of football clubs (neither are wages) but it is clearly a solid indicator.
That's the exact point I'm making.
Net spend means nothing. Because look at newcastle they get gifted 35 million for carroll and so get to buy six players for 'no net spend'.
They've never done it those ten years, though. And they probably won't do it thsi year, either.
- Status
