spectateur
Player Valuation: £30m
BBC news thread has some details.I read somewhere (may be wrong) that her fiance is already in England.
In which case why he didnt apply for her to legally visit is madness.
BBC news thread has some details.I read somewhere (may be wrong) that her fiance is already in England.
In which case why he didnt apply for her to legally visit is madness.
Just seen one of them. 24 yo Iraqi girl. She was in Germany, doing well, judging from her attire...(Nov, 10)
Just why girl...
![]()
People are willing to take risks.
It’s like taking ecstasy when you were younger. Every Tom, [Poor language removed] and Harry was telling you that you don’t know what you were putting in your body, and that some people die from taking pills.
But you did it anyway, why? Because you didn’t think it would happen to you. You acknowledged the risk but did it anyway, because you didn’t think it would happen to you.
Every person that has died from taking ‘ecstasy’ didn’t think it would happen to them.
I didnt take any Es for the reasons youve given.
Again though, taking a 'risk' is one thing.
Fleeing your country (supposedly) as an asylum seeker in fear of their lives shouldnt mean they suddenly want to travel further than they need to...
...let alone jump in a makeshift 'boat' and try to cross the channel.
Using your example...drug dealers where you live wanf fo kill you. Do you:
A: Move to somewhere far away where youre safe
B: Go to somewhere even further then take a bunch of random drugs youve never heard of and have no idea whats inside -- despite believing its extremely risky and you could die. Because while youre on your 'trip' (see what i did there) if you survive...youre now even further away.
What kind of nincompoop chooses B.
TBF its probably very difficult to do that - they won't be using their real names to the migrants, who will have incentives (fear and self-interest) not to talk to the cops anyway. Even the money might not be immediately traceable, though it probably does end up here.
I'm intrigued.
Belarus authorities are at the very least turning a blind eye to the large number of people / migrants / asylum seekers attempting to cross the border with Poland, and we are told that people are dying in the attempt to cross the borders. Poland is attempting to secure it's border with Belarus and deny further entries... The general consensus among anyone I've spoken to about this is that Belarus is acting abominably.
France is doing the same re people attempting to cross the channel in circumstances that are certainly arguably as dangerous... So why is France not subject to the same criticism as Belarus?
I'm intrigued.
Belarus authorities are at the very least turning a blind eye to the large number of people / migrants / asylum seekers attempting to cross the border with Poland, and we are told that people are dying in the attempt to cross the borders. Poland is attempting to secure it's border with Belarus and deny further entries... The general consensus among anyone I've spoken to about this is that Belarus is acting abominably.
France is doing the same re people attempting to cross the channel in circumstances that are certainly arguably as dangerous... So why is France not subject to the same criticism as Belarus?
Clueless… absolutely clueless ffsI didnt take any Es for the reasons youve given.
Again though, taking a 'risk' is one thing.
Fleeing your country (supposedly) as an asylum seeker in fear of their lives shouldnt mean they suddenly want to travel further than they need to...
...let alone jump in a makeshift 'boat' and try to cross the channel.
Using your example...drug dealers where you live wanf fo kill you. Do you:
A: Move to somewhere far away where youre safe
B: Go to somewhere even further then take a bunch of random drugs youve never heard of and have no idea whats inside -- despite believing its extremely risky and you could die. Because while youre on your 'trip' (see what i did there) if you survive...youre now even further away.
What kind of nincompoop chooses B.
Clueless… absolutely clueless ffs
I didnt take any Es for the reasons youve given.
Again though, taking a 'risk' is one thing.
Fleeing your country (supposedly) as an asylum seeker in fear of their lives shouldnt mean they suddenly want to travel further than they need to...
...let alone jump in a makeshift 'boat' and try to cross the channel.
Using your example...drug dealers where you live wanf fo kill you. Do you:
A: Move to somewhere far away where youre safe
B: Go to somewhere even further then take a bunch of random drugs youve never heard of and have no idea whats inside -- despite believing its extremely risky and you could die. Because while youre on your 'trip' (see what i did there) if you survive...youre now even further away.
What kind of nincompoop chooses B.
I have seen the accusations that Belarus has been flying them in. Personally, I'm inclined to suspect they're true. However, would we still consider Belarus at fault even if those specific accusations are false?Isn't Belarus accused of flying the people in? Of propagating false information that they will be accepted into the EU via Poland?
I think France would have to fly in refugees from Doha or wherever then direct them to take boats from France to England for it to be a fair comparison in my opinion.
So then why are we seeing little, if any, criticism of Poland?I guess, collectively, everyone was happy to blame Belarus but here it's getting split between France and the UK - I've seen plenty of criticism of both
Ah yes, sad.
She looks to be from the financially well off.
Going to England why?
Who knows, likely family pressure or as has been suggested she speaks some English, little or no German.
I have seen the accusations that Belarus has been flying them in. Personally, I'm inclined to suspect they're true. However, would we still consider Belarus at fault even if those specific accusations are false?
I suspect we would.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.