Current Affairs 2024 POTUS race

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bret Baier interview with Harris was a bad one. Kamalas staff literally cut it short according to Baier.

like I said before Harris is awful when theres no teleprompter in sight and that she's damaging her own campaign more than his opponent.
Like most observers on here have said, you have an infants understanding of the world and your cheerleading for events that will destroy lives is gross.
 
Last edited:
The Fox News interview was a train crash for Harris.

I suspect the only reason she was on there was because her team feels she's struggling and needs a desperate reach out to GOP voters who may be wavering.

She looks under severe pressure and came across a bit ragged. Her attempt to distance herself from Biden looked like a last ditch move to get a grip of Michigan by getting Arab-Americans back on board. That state looks like it's moving over into the Trump column.

By allowing some podium time to Arab Americans at the DNC this may have been avoided. She and her team played it way too safe though. I believe she'll pay the price there in Michigan.
 
Last edited:
The Fox News interview was a train crash for Harris.

I suspect the only reason she was on there was because her team feels she's struggling and needs a desperate reach out to GOP voters who may be wavering.

She looks under severe pressure and came across a bit ragged. Her attempt to distance herself from Biden looked like a last ditch move to get a grip of Michigan by getting Arab-Americans back on board. That state looks like it's moving over into the Trump column.

By allowing some podium time to Arab Americans at the DNC this may have been avoided. She and her team played it way too safe though. I believe she'll pay the price there in Michigan.
It really wasn't and I'm going to guess you haven't actually watched it and had this post lined up regardless. She was against a host who basically didn't want to let her speak or get her arguments across but she still managed it and made him look stupid quite a few times.
 
No need to take that patronising stance with me. Not only because it's dumb it's also totally wrong.
Get into the details then instead of goading folk who are genuinely fearful for the consequences of a destructive facist in power, all you post is 'Kamala talk bad' and a laughable misunderstanding of what tax is.

All the while cheering on from the sidelines like it's a football match with a winner/loser and no real outcome that will affect the most vulnerable in heartbreaking ways. Your limited posting style is disrespectful of a serious situation and is the reason you get zero respect in return.
 
Get into the details then instead of goading folk who are genuinely fearful for the consequences of a destructive facist in power, all you post is 'Kamala talk bad' and a laughable misunderstanding of what tax is.

All the while cheering on from the sidelines like it's a football match with a winner/loser and no real outcome that will affect the most vulnerable in heartbreaking ways. Your limited posting style is disrespectful of a serious situation and is the reason you get zero respect in return.
"Serious situation"? Elections? Or where are you referring to?
 
It really wasn't and I'm going to guess you haven't actually watched it and had this post lined up regardless. She was against a host who basically didn't want to let her speak or get her arguments across but she still managed it and made him look stupid quite a few times.
The interviewer pressed her for precision. She handled that reasonably well, however she allowed herself to be talked down to and that wasn't a great look; then she attempted to deal with that but looked ragged doing it. I know that can be interpreted as a gender bias analysis and one based on tone, but it really isn't. On the issues she looked ropey...

There was a lot of errors in there: not fully endorsing the trans issue in prisons but merely stating it's a legal requirement and that she'll go along with it; a half-arsed attempt to distance herself from Biden's four years in office; struggling badly on the border questioning she was getting and pretty much agreeing - ridiculously - the situation is not one to be proud of; waffled badly on defending her own record as VP.

I watched the CNN panel afterward and there was pretty much agreement that 'she was strong' but that the interview wasn't great.

Again, I want Trump beaten, but Harris and Walz look like a weak ticket to me. This should have been a slam dunk once Biden was out the way; any competent Democratic ticket - and one with a massive warchest dwarfing Trumps - should have galloped into the distance and away from that lunatic. As it is it's still a toss up.
 
Last edited:
Not seen any clips of the fox IV. How did she fair? I'd there a,feeling she will do Rogan? I think it'd be a good thing as Trump would then be forced to do the same in quick succession and the US would see a good contrast and compare
 
Not seen any clips of the fox IV. How did she fair? I'd there a,feeling she will do Rogan? I think it'd be a good thing as Trump would then be forced to do the same in quick succession and the US would see a good contrast and compare
She got pressed very hard, harder than I expected. I don't think it was a great performance by her, but she did okay, and I think it was a positive move by her campaign to go into the lions den.
 
She got pressed very hard, harder than I expected. I don't think it was a great performance by her, but she did okay, and I think it was a positive move by her campaign to go into the lions den.
Yeah, maybe some die hard Republicans (who don't approve of Trump) would have been impressed by her taking on the 'opposition ' and showing a bit of fire in her belly? If it was the other way round, trump would have stopped the interview after 5 minutes, no doubt
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top