dholliday
deconstructed rep
The old Shaker hymn tells us "'Tis a gift to be simple." No need to be so judgmental.
ignorance is strength and all that
The old Shaker hymn tells us "'Tis a gift to be simple." No need to be so judgmental.
I find the “Sanders would have beaten Trump” a really fascinating theory.And Joe Rogan fans skew extremely male, somewhat simple, and highly susceptible to nutritional supplement pitches.
The "Sanders would've beaten Trump" myth is apparently being retooled for 2020 but with a composite of Warren and Biden in the role of Hillary Clinton.
Ok well for starters, your quote is inaccurate, since that’s not what I said. I said overwhelmingly male (not an unreasonable assumption of a show hosted by a guy who made his name on UFC, within a medium that skews both white AND male) and majority white (see podcast comment).you're being awkward again.
and "overwhelmingly white male" listeners??? evidence required otherwise you've fallen into the identity-politics trap.
Ok well for starters, your quote is inaccurate, since that’s not what I said. I said overwhelmingly male (not an unreasonable assumption of a show hosted by a guy who made his name on UFC, within a medium that skews both white AND male) and majority white (see podcast comment).
Also, given that his guest list is 91% male, seems unlikely that there’s even a close to even gender split.
I’m sure there’s a demographic breakdown out there somewhere if you’re that interested in a disproval - but there’s a deep irony in you asking someone else for evidence given your history
Probably because one of Sanders key weaknesses in 2016 primary was non white voters and that appears to be the case in this primary too, although to a lesser extent.UFC has a very mixed racial demographic, both with the fighters and with the fans.
Why did you even bring up skin colour anyway?
Probably because one of Sanders key weaknesses in 2016 primary was non white voters and that appears to be the case in this primary too although to a lesser extent.
You might not think it healthy but given the demographics of the primary whether a candidate can attract their vote or not has a significant effect on whether they win the nomination.i don't think it's healthy to put all non-whites into this big soup labelled "must appeal to them" .
not saying it's just us doing it...society does it. i'm with Morgan Freeman on this (paraphrasing: "don't call me a black man, i'm an american" ).
Because skewing in any one direction makes it EVEN less valid as “evidence” that Sanders is the ONLY candidate who can beat Trump.UFC has a very mixed racial demographic, both with the fighters and with the fans.
Why did you even bring up skin colour anyway?
You might not think it healthy but given the demographics of the primary whether a candidate can attract their vote or not has a significant effect on whether they win the nomination.
oh and fwiw I never mentioned UFC’s racial demographic
I'm all aboard the Warren Hype Train now

@dholliday i do agree with you on podcasts that they can be very important and can garner numbers of interested opinions but it is also not an ideal way of deciding demographics.
As you will have noticed over the last year I am not a fan of polls either.
For me its listening and paying attention to the new groups bei g created across social media. Those who appear on the news or on media platforms who are letting us know what they want.
Know I get you weren't stuck on demographics but it felt the best place to make the point to all haha! Simply as great as podcasts are its not as if we know for certain who listening unless it's a podcast dedicated to a certain demographic.agree steve! tho' it wasn't me who got stuck on demographics, that was @BirkenheadBlue
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.