Current Affairs 2020 Democratic Primary

Go on then

  • Abrams

  • Biden

  • Bloomberg

  • Booker

  • Brown

  • Castro

  • de Blasio

  • Gabbard

  • Gillibrand

  • Harris

  • Hickenlooper

  • Holder

  • Kerry

  • Klobuchar

  • Moulton

  • O'Rourke

  • Sanders

  • Vegan Cheese on Toasted Artisanal Sourdough (Gluten Free)

  • Warren

  • Winfrey


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
If one of Biden, Warren or Sanders gets it they'll be going up against a fellow old person anyway in Trump.

Shame none of the middle-aged semi-favourites seem to be any good. Beto and Kamala are definite no-go's.




It's not much but it's something: the feedback from the Rogan podcast was overwhelmingly positive. Rogan's audience is very mixed, but a lot of conservative and alt-right types among them.

10 million views, 175,000 comments. A lot of people were pleasantly surprised at how reasonable and well-argued Bernie's ideas are when they were lead to believe (by rightwing media) that he was a crazy socialist.

Trump's hardcore base won't be enough to keep him in, he needs an opponent who moderate Republicans can't get on board with (like Warren).
I’m sorry mate but the # hits on a Josh Rogan podcast is a very thin reed of evidence!
 
A few positive comments on a podcast listened to by a (non representative) minute fraction of the population is... not evidence
I’m sorry mate but the # hits on a Josh Rogan podcast is a very thin reed of evidence!

How is that any worse than a poll?

I believe online feedback to be a relatively reliable barometer of folk's thinking, as long as it's understood we're dealing with a rough snapshot. I wouldn't class mainstream polls as necessarily superior. Such polls have been very wrong in the recent past.
 
How is that any worse than a poll?

I believe online feedback to be a relatively reliable barometer of folk's thinking, as long as it's understood we're dealing with a rough snapshot. I wouldn't class mainstream polls as necessarily superior. Such polls have been very wrong in the recent past.
Because polls are based on likely or registered voters. You have no idea if the people who view a Rogan podcast are even eligible to vote in the US! Iirc online results also tend to skew younger, whiter, more male and richer than the electorate at large
 
How is that any worse than a poll?

I believe online feedback to be a relatively reliable barometer of folk's thinking, as long as it's understood we're dealing with a rough snapshot. I wouldn't class mainstream polls as necessarily superior. Such polls have been very wrong in the recent past.
Self-selected samples are just about the most inaccurate type of poll. Which is roughly what comments on a podcast would be as they are only drawing from the people who saw the podcast which will be a particular type of demographic.
 
Because polls are based on likely or registered voters. You have no idea if the people who view a Rogan podcast are even eligible to vote in the US! Iirc online results also tend to skew younger, whiter, more males and richer than the electorate at large

likely is the key word here. it's a very relative one too.

regarding whiter/richer...who are darker/poorer folk more likely to favour? Warren, Biden or Sanders?
 
likely is the key word here. it's a very relative one too.

regarding whiter/richer...who are darker/poorer folk more likely to favour? Warren, Biden or Sanders?
I don’t know about richer/poorer, but Joe Biden is significantly the most popular candidate amongst African Americans
 
Because polls are based on likely or registered voters. You have no idea if the people who view a Rogan podcast are even eligible to vote in the US! Iirc online results also tend to skew younger, whiter, more male and richer than the electorate at large
And Joe Rogan fans skew extremely male, somewhat simple, and highly susceptible to nutritional supplement pitches.

The "Sanders would've beaten Trump" myth is apparently being retooled for 2020 but with a composite of Warren and Biden in the role of Hillary Clinton.
 
@LinekersLegs @Ruairi77 @BirkenheadBlue

The importance of podcasts, and Rogan's the biggest, can't be underestimated. Note the feedback from the republican/libertarian/conservative end towards Sanders after the podcast from not just the comments, but analysts. Even Foxnews reported on it somewhere between neutrally and positively.

Podcasts and online feedback is a big deal for Presidential candidates. It's 2019...everyone is online now. After Sanders' appearance, the web exploded with analysis, from all ends of the spectrum. These are read widely. Here's some:





 
@LinekersLegs @Ruairi77 @BirkenheadBlue

The importance of podcasts, and Rogan's the biggest, can't be underestimated. Note the feedback from the republican/libertarian/conservative end towards Sanders after the podcast from not just the comments, but analysts. Even Foxnews reported on it somewhere between neutrally and positively.

Podcasts and online feedback is a big deal for Presidential candidates. It's 2019...everyone is online now. After Sanders' appearance, the web exploded with analysis, from all ends of the spectrum. These are read widely. Here's some:





Except no one has once doubted the importance of podcasts

merely the validity of their comments sections as evidence that ONLY one candidate can beat Trump. Particularly when citing a podcast whose listeners are overwhelmingly male (and likely majority white) about a candidate whose problems lie outside of that demo
 
Except no one has once doubted the importance of podcasts

merely the validity of their comments sections as evidence that ONLY one candidate can beat Trump. Particularly when citing a podcast whose listeners are overwhelmingly male (and likely majority white) about a candidate whose problems lie outside of that demo

you're being awkward again.

and "overwhelmingly white male" listeners??? evidence required otherwise you've fallen into the identity-politics trap.
 
And Joe Rogan fans skew extremely male, somewhat simple,

jesus...no wonder folk are so divided when there's such derogatory name-calling of a group containing many millions of discerning listeners of detailed podcasts.

so what are progressive liberal Twitter users then, with their one-liners and short attention spans? single-cell organisms?
 
likely is the key word here. it's a very relative one too.

regarding whiter/richer...who are darker/poorer folk more likely to favour? Warren, Biden or Sanders?
Most polls have a series of questions to determine who are “Likely voters”, usually based on things like past voting/how interested are in current election, and often backtest to determine how accurate those questions were at determining who actually did end up voting by cross tabbing with voter rolls. Obviously “likely voter” models are not infallible but it can still be informative,

Politico does a really helpful analysis on the demographics of the candidates support.
 
jesus...no wonder folk are so divided when there's such derogatory name-calling of a group containing many millions of discerning listeners of detailed podcasts.
The old Shaker hymn tells us "'Tis a gift to be simple." No need to be so judgmental.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top