But like everything else in the world, men have the benefit of privelige.
Women’s football has only been allowed to exist for a fraction of the time men’s football has, because they’re women!
Girls weren’t allowed to play football at school when I was a kid and I’m under 40, so it’s no surprise the quality is not as high.
Overall, pay is linked to commercial revenues - fair enough.
The very biggest teams get disgusting amounts of money, and so the very best players earn disgusting sums also.
Hence the highest paid women footballers earning less in a year than plenty of average male players earn in a week of a month.
But that falls down at the international level in the USA, which is where the pay discussion is being had.
They men earn far more than the women at club level, I’m sure. They’re not arguing to change that.
But at international level;
1 team is garbage; the other is the best compared to their competition
1 team does nothing to promote the popularity of the game in their country through their abilities; the other just had a ticker tape parade through New York city
1 team is generally mocked by their country; the other inspires people and improves lives.
Now... do you still think the argument your making hold water.