Discussion in 'Everton Forum' started by R934, Sep 12, 2017.
How about all of the above.
Astonished Koeman is getting more blame than Moshiri in this poll. Are you all mad? He publicly stated what he needed and had no say in how transfers are conducted.
Indeed, Moshiri is in last place. Again, are you all mad?
I don't get the argument that Koeman must be completely blameless because he said in an interview that we needed a striker. What relevance does that have exactly? He recognised we needed one, but that doesn't mean he had no impact on whether we actually got one or not.
Its a bit like us saying we can completely excuse Sandro from scoring if he comes out tomorrow and says he understands that goals are good.
What's the difference between Moshiri and the board? Is he not on the board? Add those 2 poll numbers together and baby you got a stew going.
We could have kept lukaku -' son we will sell u when we have a replacement. Fair enough?' If no replacement, 'sorry son 2 more years left, so a we will keep u one more year, it's a world cup year and you are a pro'
I see 12 bottlers have claimed 'the board' is to blame and have put 'the board' into the lead.
Bang on we should have pulled a Coutinho/Sanchez.
Ronald the anti football Koeman is the man to blame. If he put as much effort into management as he does his golf and eating then we'd stand a far better chance of progressing than we currently do.
Sadly we will be looking at a squad rebuild again part way through next season when his replacement comes in and picks up the pieces of a shambolic defence and a non existent front line. Enjoy life in Spain Ron you massive self centred shitbag.
Coleman going down seems to have ruined Koeman. You could argue that Coleman converted him to this wingerless system in the first place as we didn't need them with him in the team.
No difference between the board and Moshiri
He controls all the strings now
Davek's curse...and 72 points...
We hadn't lost a game this season before @Sapie88 and @davek were banned.
Make of THAT what you will.
He didn't need replacing?
I'd say Walsh, if any. Otherwise, what is he there for?
Separate names with a comma.