roydo
in memoriam - 1965-2024
It only remains unanswered if you ignore any chance that at any point people buy a sizeable stake in any company without demanding or having a say in that company mate
Paul insists no one would purchase a 30% share of Arsenal without having some voice, but ignores any point put to him about countless other companies that have large % shareholders who are perfectly happy to just have it as an investment.
he could sell them to an investment fund, or an individual who is perfectly happy with as Paul calls it 'premier league exposure' (yet discounts anyone else valuing that besides when he states its benefit to Usmanov and Moshiri), Kroenke may decide finally he would like full ownership - which 'actually' does carry benefits to him which he hasn't already got - you think Kroenke may like not having to call AGM's and answer to people? - full ownership i believe he can do just that. Hell he can even put the shares up for general sale - given Arsenals global fan base, given how well it does in corporate sales etc and given the clubs profile, do you think they wouldn't sell fast if he did so?
Aye, that could be possible.
Thing is though, if someone wanted it as an investment, would that someone be content that they have absolutely no say in how said investment is run or managed? But then I own about 12 shares in Standard Life, and let some others do whatever they do. Would I be happy that they would still deliver a decent return if I owned 30%?
Maybe? Dunno.








