Current Affairs Ukraine

[Lobster Johnson]

Which shopping centre do you go to where there are no cars parked closet to the entrance,and missiles that don't blast the walls or windows out of buildings ??

Ones that aren't in a war zone, normally.

 

[Deleted member 48881]

Which shopping centre do you go to where there are no cars parked closet to the entrance,and missiles that don't blast the walls or windows out of buildings ??

you are a clown

 

[ForeverBlue92]

Big unit alert.

Southall has gone rogue.

 

[davids]

Remind me, brainiac, how many missile struck shopping centres have you been to? It is clearly on fire, the missle could have struck the other side of the complex. Are you for real? Are you actually this stupid?

"dur..the cars are not damaged, it must be fake"

Never suggested it was fake,it just looks odd that a missile would hit a shopping centre and yet windows are still intact,no cars damaged in the carpark. Plenty of footage of missiles fired from drones in the Middle East to see the damage they cause. If it was an accidental fire I'd blame it on Russia.

 

[Noisy noise annoys]

Never suggested it was fake,it just looks odd that a missile would hit a shopping centre and yet windows are still intact,no cars damaged in the carpark. Plenty of footage of missiles fired from drones in the Middle East to see the damage they cause. If it was an accidental fire I'd blame it on Russia.

The shopping centre near me is nearly half a mile long!

If you weren’t insinuating it was a fake, what were you trying to say?

 

[devogue]

Never suggested it was fake,it just looks odd that a missile would hit a shopping centre and yet windows are still intact,no cars damaged in the carpark. Plenty of footage of missiles fired from drones in the Middle East to see the damage they cause. If it was an accidental fire I'd blame it on Russia.

doesnt look like an accidental fire imo

 

[davids]

doesnt look like an accidental fire imo

I posted "if it was" not suggesting it is,just pointing out how strange that a missile that could do that damage wouldn't have blow out the shop fronts as shown in the first picture posted,and odd that there would be no cars close to the shopping centre entrance,as you would see normally.
But then in the attack on the railway station the cars were all damaged but the building appears untouched.

Russia denies striking train station in Kramatorsk

Credit: AFP Photo

en.royanews.tv

War can be strange. Only an observation nothing more.

 

[Noisy noise annoys]

Russia denies striking train station in Kramatorsk

Credit: AFP Photo

en.royanews.tv

War can be strange. Only an observation nothing more.

What if, stay with me here, it is quite complex, the missile at the station landed nearer the cars?!

 

[davids]

What if, stay with me here, it is quite complex, the missile at the station landed nearer the cars?!

But didn't damage the building... it's war don't worry about it.

 

[Noisy noise annoys]

But didn't damage the building... it's war don't worry about it.

Missiles dont just go on forever, they have a finite area of damage. Some hit cars, some hit buildings, some hit both, common sense really

Stop looking for stuff that’s not there for some weird agenda

 

[davids]

Missiles dont just go on forever, they have a finite area of damage. Some hit cars, some hit buildings, some hit both, common sense really

Stop looking for stuff that’s not there for some weird agenda

Just odd that one that strikes a railway station (allegedly)sort of doesn't,but hits a line of cars. And the one that hits a shopping centre doesn't have enough blast to blow the windows out. Must just be Russian rubbish munitions.

 

[Mutzo Nutzo]

The missile involved in the strike has been confirmed as a KH-22 it’s an anti-ship missile (confirmed by pro-Russian sources). It carries a 1000kg shaped charge warhead.

It’s designed to kill ships - the shaped charge directs all kinetic energy forward (to breach a ships hull) this process generates a lot of heat and the effect is incendiary. Ships hit by one of these are generally sunk by the subsequent on-board fire.

In this case it could explain the limited wide-area blast damage and the fire which did the real damage.

 

[Noisy noise annoys]

Just odd that one that strikes a railway station (allegedly)sort of doesn't,but hits a line of cars. And the one that hits a shopping centre doesn't have enough blast to blow the windows out. Must just be Russian rubbish munitions.

Genuine question, why so determined to deny these atrocities?

 

[devogue]

Here is the video of the missiles

 

[devogue]

Just odd that one that strikes a railway station (allegedly)sort of doesn't,but hits a line of cars. And the one that hits a shopping centre doesn't have enough blast to blow the windows out. Must just be Russian rubbish munitions.

Wdym allegedly. Both Ukrainian and Russian sources agree that a missile hit the station, they just disagree on who fired it.