Current Affairs Ukraine

Status
Not open for further replies.
Kremlin-sponsored outlet Izvestia published and quickly removed an appeal by the First Deputy Head of the Russian Presidential Administration Sergey Kirelenko for Russia to rebuild the Donbas on June 12 and blamed hackers for what they (likely falsely) claimed was a “fake publication.” Izvestia likely intended to save the article for a later date to set informational conditions for Russian annexation of Donbas. Kirelenko’s appeal stated that Russia will restore the Donbas regardless of high costs or if doing so lowers the standard of living in Russia. Izvestia blamed unknown hackers for publishing a “fake article,” but it is possible that hackers instead released an article Izvestia had prepared to publish at a later date. The Kremlin previously published and removed an article prematurely celebrating a Russian victory over Ukraine in late February and discussing the capture of Ukraine in past tense in anticipation of Ukraine’s capitulation during the first Russian-Ukrainian negotiations in Belarus. Unnamed Kremlin officials previously identified Kirelenko as the future head of a new Russian federal district, which would encompass Donbas, and occupied settlements in Kherson and Zaporizhia Oblasts.

Russia continues to deploy insufficiently prepared volunteer and reserve forces to reinforce its ongoing operations. Kremlin-sponsored outlet Izvestia released footage showing Russian artillery reservists undergoing training with old D-20 howitzers reportedly within 10 days of their deployment to Ukraine. The reservists focused on learning how to operate hand-held weapons, despite being reportedly only days away from deploying. Social media footage also showed Russian forces transporting Russian volunteer and reserve units with T-80BV tanks (a variant produced in 1985, as opposed to the modernized T-80 BVM operated by the 1st Guards Tank Army) and BMP-1 armored personnel carriers (which have largely been phased out in favor of the BMP-2) to Belgorod Oblast on June 9. Additional social media footage showed Russian forces transporting T-80BV tanks removed from storage in Moscow Oblast on June 9.


A bizarre article that - as much as the Russian goals for this war have shifted depending on who from Moscow has been talking, they've always said they were doing this for the two republics and the two republics have been dependent on Russia ever since 2014.
 
It is from November 2021. I especially like how completely dismissive he is of Ellwood, as if Ellwood is talking about what shade of brown to paint a park bench rather than the defence of the bloody realm.
The question should always be,what is necessary to defend the UK and what is deemed necessary to defend the financial interests of the UK abroad.
 
The question should always be,what is necessary to defend the UK and what is deemed necessary to defend the financial interests of the UK abroad.

Indeed. The strategic reviews take input from many sources and a great deal of thought goes into them. The real question Is why our defence budget is at such a low % of GDP….
 
Indeed. The strategic reviews take input from many sources and a great deal of thought goes into them. The real question Is why our defence budget is at such a low % of GDP….
But in fact Pete it should just be about protecting the sovereign state of the UK only. If the big oil companies want their interests protecting,there are private contractors for that.
 
But in fact Pete it should just be about protecting the sovereign state of the UK only. If the big oil companies want their interests protecting,there are private contractors for that.

That would be nice, but we also provide defence in the waters around Europe, ground and air military in Estonia and other EU countries all at our cost with never a word of thanks……
 
That would be nice, but we also provide defence in the waters around Europe, ground and air military in Estonia and other EU countries all at our cost with never a word of thanks……
In a sensible world that would stop. The fortunes spent on Trident should be all that's needed. You'd have imagined the defence of EU countries would have been withdrawn at Brexit.
 
Indeed. The strategic reviews take input from many sources and a great deal of thought goes into them. The real question Is why our defence budget is at such a low % of GDP….

I am not sure they do pete, I mean they nearly always come up with "fewer service personnel, less equipment" whenever someone does one (of whatever party).
 
I am not sure they do pete, I mean they nearly always come up with "fewer service personnel, less equipment" whenever someone does one (of whatever party).
Things appear to be changing (slowly) in respect of U.K. armed forces procurement.

Looks like we’ve ordered 532 Boxer 8 wheel AFV’s that come with modular turret and firing systems giving us a multitude of capabilities on a single common chassis.

Still need to sort out the tracked IFV warrior replacement though - IMO they should sack off Ajax and buy an alternative off-the-shelf model.
 
I am not sure they do pete, I mean they nearly always come up with "fewer service personnel, less equipment" whenever someone does one (of whatever party).

No, they are really detailed reviews with many inputs. I contributed, in a very minuscule way, years ago and saw the effort from MoD and Industry in trying to get it right…..
 
Things appear to be changing (slowly) in respect of U.K. armed forces procurement.

Looks like we’ve ordered 532 Boxer 8 wheel AFV’s that come with modular turret and firing systems giving us a multitude of capabilities on a single common chassis.

Still need to sort out the tracked IFV warrior replacement though - IMO they should sack off Ajax and buy an alternative off-the-shelf model.

Yep, that Ajax is a bit of a dogs breakfast…..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top