@PhilM &
@Mutzo Nutzo : gentlemen, if you happen to have a few moments, would you explain the tangible benefits of Finland & Sweden joining NATO, please. And also, what real lessons will NATO planners have learned from the Ukrainian conflict? And if I can try your patience a bit further, what steps re defence should the U K be taking in the short to medium term?
Sorry to bother you both.
I hope that the U.K. and NATO have learnt many lessons from this conflict.
1.The use and capability of drones/UAV’s as well as the capability to counter this technology is vital.
2. The use of light, mobile forces armed with ATGM’s are a real force multiplier. Ukranian SOF caused absolute havoc with their golf buggies and NLAW’s/Stugna/Javelins
3. Artillery kills troops and destroys moral - the ability to deploy large numbers of mobile self propelled guns with precision guided ammunition capable of destroying a tank from 60km is hopefully a massive lesson.
4. We really need to upgrade our MBT’s and also add more numbers plus the ability to recover and repair them in a combat situation (yes more tractors please).
5. ISTAR/EW I cannot underestimate the requirement to keep increasing funding of this capability - its a real game changer on the modern battlefield.
And we must spend on our armed forces - we need a much bigger standing army, more aircraft and more ships