Current Affairs Ukraine

Status
Not open for further replies.
They'd have had one more weapon ready by mid to late August, so you're talking about two to three weeks after Nagasaki; more were expected in September.

However, evidence suggests there use had become questionable in the corridors of power, which meant they were unlikely to be used unless truly required.

In terms of Russia, a fair few blunders and political infighting within 1944 and 45 meant we didn't drive to Berlin as we should have done.
Recollections (especially internet based ones) may vary on this and - shock horror - not everything that has been written is on the internet*
*depends what you've read pre internet, how accurate it was even then and, finally - did it seem likely, aka, do you believe it.
I consider Richard Rhodes to be a credible source on the subject. @PhilM is correct that Truman would not have authorized dropping another one.
 
Another Russian Colonel has been killed.



Estimated Russian losses to date.

View attachment 163230
Even if the figures were 50% of those indicated above, it's more than many standing armies have in their entire arsenal. These are huge figures!

Let's not forget, Russia has a GDP less than Italy, so the talk from some circles that they'll be able to use gas and oil to rebuild is far from an accurate portrayal.

The scary thing is they seem to be winning on the ground
Are they?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top