Current Affairs Ukraine

Status
Not open for further replies.
China launched cyber-attacks on Ukrainian military and nuclear targets shortly before the Russian invasion, according to a report.

The UK government confirmed that the National Cyber Security Centre was investigating the allegations, which claim that more than 600 websites, including Ukraine’s defence ministry, were subjected to thousands of hacking attempts coordinated by the Chinese government.

 
I think there's a few points that shouldn't be ignored such as the depleted ammunition and oil, the concern about redeployment and how feints can be effective.

It's going to be a difficult few months for Ukraine if the RA can effectively rearm and redeploy troops towards the east in sizeable numbers.

However, to suggest that the Russian drive towards Kyiv was a feint all along is laughable - it's cherry picking points to glue them to some bizarre narrative.

Battlefield tactics have been inept, many key units including their better troops (look at the BBC at the 331st VDV today) have been heavily depleted.

They've lost huge quantity of armour (tanks, IFV, APCs), logistic weapons, anti-aircraft and air assets. Their stockpile of PGM appears to have been stripped.

Deep attack against Ukrainian logistics as well? Let's say it simply: they planned to attack on three fronts and thought they'd win, but one has been successful.

The rest they haven't hence why it's now readjusting its forces. If they wanted a feint, stationing troops on the border would have probably been enough.
They counted on Blitzkrieg, quickly taking Kyiv and decapitating Ukrainian leadership and command in first few days. That obviously failed.

Also 150 000 troops (i think) is just too small number to conduct 3 simultaneous offensives against country of size of Ukraine. After all, its 2nd largest country in Europe with 45 million population and like 300 000 initial troops (without counting reserves).

Even my country of 4 million (Croatia) had 200 000 troops for our final offensive in 1995. We were also supported by US with information and stuff at the time (that was after massacre at Srebrenica).
 
A very sober assessment by Scott Ritter.


Day 36 of the Russian SMO in the Ukraine – a look at Ukrainian military


Scott Ritter

@RealScottRitter

1/ Big Arrow War—a primer. For all those scratching their heads in confusion, or dusting off their dress uniforms for the Ukrainian victory parade in Kiev, over the news about Russia’s “strategic shift”, you might want to re-familiarize yourself with basic military concepts.

2/ Maneuver warfare is a good place to start. Understand Russia started its “special military operation” with a severe manpower deficit—200,000 attackers to some 600,000 defenders (or more). Classic attritional conflict was never an option. Russian victory required maneuver.

3/ Maneuver war is more psychological than physical and focuses more on the operational than on the tactical level. Maneuver is relational movement—how you deploy and move your forces in relation to your opponent. Russian maneuver in the first phase of its operation support this.

4/ The Russians needed to shape the battlefield to their advantage. In order to do this, they needed to control how Ukraine employed it’s numerically superior forces, while distributing their own smaller combat power to best accomplish this objective.

5/ Strategically, to facilitate the ability to maneuver between the southern, central, and northern fronts, Russia needed to secure a land bridge between Crimea and Russia. The seizure of the coastal city of Mariupol was critical to this effort. Russia has accomplished this task.

6/ While this complex operation unfolded, Russia needed to keep Ukraine from maneuvering its numerically superior forces in a manner that disrupted the Mariupol operation. This entailed the use of several strategic supporting operations—feints, fixing operations, and deep attack.

7/ The concept of a feint is simple—a military force either is seen as preparing to attack a given location, or actually conducts an attack, for the purpose of deceiving an opponent into committing resources in response to the perceived or actual actions.

8/ The use of the feint played a major role in Desert Storm, where Marine Amphibious forces threatened the Kuwaiti coast, forcing Iraq to defend against an attack that never came, and where the 1st Cavalry Division actually attacked Wadi Al Batin to pin down the Republican Guard.

9/ The Russians made extensive use of the feint in Ukraine, with Amphibious forces off Odessa freezing Ukrainian forces there, and a major feint attack toward Kiev compelling Ukraine to reinforce their forces there. Ukraine was never able to reinforce their forces in the east.

10/ Fixing operations were also critical. Ukraine had assembled some 60,000-100,000 troops in the east, opposite Donbas. Russia carried out a broad fixing attack designed to keep these forces fully engaged and unable to maneuver in respect to other Russian operations.

11/ During Desert Storm, two Marine Divisions were ordered to carry out similar fixing attacks against Iraqi forces deployed along the Kuwaiti-Saudi border, tying down significant numbers of men and material that could not be used to counter the main US attack out west.

12/ The Russian fixing attack pinned the main Ukrainian concentration of forces in the east, and drove them away from Mariupol, which was invested and reduced. Supporting operations out of Crimea against Kherson expanded the Russian land bridge. This phase is now complete.

13/ Russia also engaged in a campaign of strategic deep attack designed to disrupt and destroy Ukrainian logistics, command & control, and air power and long-range fire support. Ukraine is running out of fuel and ammo, cannot coordinate maneuver, and has no meaningful Air Force.

14/ Russia is redeploying some of its premier units from where they had been engaged in feint operations in northern Kiev to where they can support the next phase of the operation, namely the liberation of the Donbas and the destruction of the main Ukrainian force in the east.

15/ This is classic maneuver warfare. Russia will now hold Ukraine in the north and south while its main forces, reinforced by the northern units, Marines, and forces freed up by the capture of Mariupol, seek to envelope and destroy 60,000 Ukrainian forces in the east.

16/ This is Big Arrow War at its finest, something Americans used to know but forgot in the deserts and mountains of Afghanistan and Iraq. It also explains how 200,000 Russians have been able to defeat 600,000 Ukrainians. Thus ends the primer on maneuver warfare, Russian style.

And ...


Gen Sir Nick Parker, former commander of land forces in the British army, has somewhat controversially said Nato has been “defeated”, and called for a smaller coalition of nations to develop an offensive counter-strategy to the Russian president, Vladimir Putin.

PA Media quote him telling BBC Radio 4’s Today programme:

Straight out of the Kremlin PR dept.

And the point Nick Parker was making is a very sensible one, there are too many voices in NATO……
 
Watch the documentary about this the other day, was quite shocked at the number of lash ups that were made resulting in so many unnecessary British deaths, and how much of a close call it was to losing the war.
They had an admiral on the news talking this morning about how lucky we were that a huge part of the British fleet was on excersise (gathered) around Gibraltar and could head off to the Falklands in rapid time. It could have taken upto ten weeks otherwise and may have seen a very different outcome.
 
India's stance is disappointing however understandable.

I still think that they are the power that we need to build bridges and have more ties with.

They're too big to ignore and have border issues with China.

China I see as in league with Russia, it just doesn't serve their interests to overtly express it.

India will only grow in power and we need to court it as it Russia has been doing for its own benefits.

For this see China in Africa, while NATO nations have been sleeping the enemy have been gathering countries under their wing.

NATO and the West have become lazy and nonchalant about the threats in the world.
 
India's stance is disappointing however understandable.

I still think that they are the power that we need to build bridges and have more ties with.

They're too big to ignore and have border issues with China.

China I see as in league with Russia, it just doesn't serve their interests to overtly express it.

India will only grow in power and we need to court it as it Russia has been doing for its own benefits.

For this see China in Africa, while NATO nations have been sleeping the enemy have been gathering countries under their wing.

NATO and the West have become lazy and nonchalant about the threats in the world.
China isnt our enemy fam.
 
China isnt our enemy fam.

Yeah I realised when I posted it that it was an emotive description but couldn't be arsed changing it.

Officially they are not our enemy and sensibly I have no wish to make an enemy of China.

However despite the amount of trade we do with them we are not aligned with them politically and our goals are not their goals.

I don't even think China has a particular loyalty to Russia, China will do what benefits China and they are patient and they will wait to see how the cards fall, it's just how they are.
 
Yeah I realised when I posted it that it was an emotive description but couldn't be arsed changing it.

Officially they are not our enemy and sensibly I have no wish to make an enemy of China.

However despite the amount of trade we do with them we are not aligned with them politically and our goals are not their goals.

I don't even think China has a particular loyalty to Russia, China will do what benefits China and they are patient and they will wait to see how the cards fall, it's just how they are.
China and Russia relationship is more "enemy of my enemy is my friend" than any genuine warmth between each other. Even during communism and cold war there were border clashes between Soviets and Chinese.

India on other hand, there is a lot of old historical grudges against West, also quite a arrogant attitude of USA toward them seems to annoy them, at least from what i read from social media in last few weeks. Also apparently, from what i read form Indian users, USA supported Pakistan while Soviets/Russia was on their side during Indian-Pakistan wars, and they didn't forget that.
 
India's stance is disappointing however understandable.

I still think that they are the power that we need to build bridges and have more ties with.

They're too big to ignore and have border issues with China.

China I see as in league with Russia, it just doesn't serve their interests to overtly express it.

India will only grow in power and we need to court it as it Russia has been doing for its own benefits.

For this see China in Africa, while NATO nations have been sleeping the enemy have been gathering countries under their wing.

NATO and the West have become lazy and nonchalant about the threats in the world.

The West certainly needs to up its game, both diplomatically and in preventing economic and other harm to the countries we seek to get on side. The lamentable and ongoing failure of successive governments in this respect has been shameful, though of course in their defence they have a record of lamentable failure in every other sphere, too.
 
China and Russia relationship is more "enemy of my enemy is my friend" than any genuine warmth between each other. Even during communism and cold war there were border clashes between Soviets and Chinese.

India on other hand, there is a lot of old historical grudges against West, also quite a arrogant attitude of USA toward them seems to annoy them, at least from what i read from social media in last few weeks. Also apparently, from what i read form Indian users, USA supported Pakistan while Soviets/Russia was on their side during Indian-Pakistan wars, and they didn't forget that.

Very true.

But despite the justified resentment towards UK for colonialism and more recent grudges against US I just feel that culturally and politically they are much more aligned with the West than with Russia or China.

India's place in the world has never been more important in my opinion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top