I think it is wrong for a country's military, at the behest of its leader, to take through force and conflict the land of another country. But my overall point was that now we have armed Ukraine we must accept some responsibility for any harm that is caused in Russian territory. I'm not pro-Putin and I'm not trying to be a 60s hippy, I am just typing some opinions I have.
To be clear I wasn't assuming you were trolling and pro-putin or anything like that, as I don't think that would match your contribution in other threads
I just don't know if you have thought that through and if you had I was interested in knowing how that would work. Obviously we agree Russia should not be in Ukraine and are there in force and as an aggressor.
Do you really believe the country defending itself should solely respond by defending or attacking within their own country's border?
I think if you believe a country has a right to defend itself from such actions with whatever end goal they deem acceptable at whatever point - full withdrawal or peace terms with loss of territory - then are you saying that if they see an incursion over the border into the aggressors territory as a way to further their path to whatever success may be for them that they should discard the option as in your eyes they are acting similarly to the agressor?
I mean i get the point that is not as simple as "great, good on you Ukraine" because ultimately there are normal innocent russian people living in that area OR that a defending force should not stoop to committing war crimes in reaction to the invasion, but it just seems rather extreme a belief to want them to limit "normal" military response in such a situation