peteblue
Welcome back Wayne
I was mistaken, caught half the story.
As usual… lol
I was mistaken, caught half the story.
RIA cited data which it said showed that direct investment by the European Union, the G7 nations, Australia and Switzerland in the Russian economy at the end of 2022 totalled $288 billion.
Advertisement · Scroll to continue
It said EU nations held $223.3 billion of the assets, of which $98.3 billion was formally held by Cyprus, $50.1 billion by the Netherlands and $17.3 billion by Germany.
It said the top five European investors in the Russian economy also included France with assets and investments worth $16.6 billion and Italy with $12.9 billion.
Among the G7 countries, it named Britain as one of the largest investors, citing data at the end of 2021 which showed British assets in Russia were worth about $18.9 billion.
It said the United States had $9.6 billion worth of Russian assets at the end of 2022, Japan $4.6 billion and Canada $2.9 billion.
Switzerland and Norway, which RIA said usually signed up to anti-Russian measures, had $28.5 billion and $139 million respectively at the end of 2022, it said, while data showed Australia had $683 million invested at the end of last year.
![]()
Transferring frozen Russian reserves to Ukraine is elegant justice
Western allies of the nation are overstating the fears and failing to truly recognise the benefitswww.ft.com
Likely reaction from Russia broken down
You can see the incentive given both the relative small costs and also that if this brings victory a pathway toward global stability would appear much easier.
As you know, this has been under consideration for some time now.This is another terrible idea, especially where the UK is concerned. If countries think that their assets are not safe with you on account of them being seized without compensation, then they won’t place them with you.
These assets are also a considerable card we hold with regards to them (Russia); if we throw it away like this it doesn’t leave us holding many others with which to influence their behaviour. It’s also pretty unprecedented and difficult to see how, in the absence of a war between the EU and Russia, how it would ever be legal domestically or internationally. It seems to me to be yet another example of doing something without thinking through any of the consequences.
What would have been (and still would be) better is both removing our need for fossil fuels in such quantities, and boosting military (and other) production. The EU / UK is richer, has a greater population, a higher technological base, a higher manufacturing base and has many more inroads into Russian society than they do with ours. It’s in those areas we should focus efforts, not in idiotic acts like this.
If the entire west does this, then it's a step down the path to our financial institutions not being giant laundromats for ill gotten loot.As you know, this has been under consideration for some time now.
I agree with your previous thinking that the Europe needs to maintain its partnerships such as with the US but not rely upon the US for such critical things as defence. I agree with your position that the UK and Europe need to be able to stand alone. From that perspective it appears that this proposal is in part being driven by the GOPs tacit support of Putin in seeking to remove further support for Ukraine. Also the looming threat(s) of another Trump term.
If this seizing of assets that the EU is planning happens it would seem to be an indication that the US Europe alliance or power dynamic is shifting.
If it does happen, as risky a strategy as it might appear, if it leads to Russia being defeated in Ukraine it will send a clear message to dictators about consequences and actions resulting from aggression such as has happened in Ukraine.
Technically different situations but I understand the emotion.Will the west be doing likewise with Israeli assets to rebuild Gaza?
Thought not.
Ooh, I see little difference. I see much hypocrisy, though.Technically different situations but I understand the emotion.
As I say, the technicality is that Hamas were the aggressor in this incident.Ooh, I see little difference. I see much hypocrisy, though.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.